Review the scope as well as the content. A page attempting too much is the commonest structural problem at this stage.
The question in the title: Review cadence: how often is a page actually re-checked? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it.
I would like to know what people here actually do about Review cadence, as distinct from what is usually recommended. Those have diverged in every other subject I have looked at closely.
Mine is below, with the reasoning, including the parts I am not confident about.
Building on the opening post rather than restating it.
Where the review finds the content is right but the framing overstates it, that is the most valuable catch available at this stage.
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
About the Doc review category
Review of drafts and revisions before and after promotion. Every promotion is discussed in public. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded…
|
4 | 25k | 4mo | |
|
Review: a draft on reconstitution arithmetic, with objections — one year on
Review: a draft on reconstitution arithmetic, with objections — one year on Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. The question about draft on reconstitution…
|
+46 | 51 | 11k | 20h |
|
Review: a draft on reconstitution arithmetic, with objections
Review: a draft on reconstitution arithmetic, with objections Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Proposing that draft on reconstitution arithmetic deserves a…
|
+120 | 129 | 4.1k | 15mo |
|
A promotion I argued against, and why I lost — a second dataset
A promotion I argued against, and why I lost — a second dataset Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Posting a small dataset on promotion. It is mine, it is…
|
+3 | 7 | 32k | 12h |
|
Promotion criteria, and the one that stops most nominations
Promotion criteria, and the one that stops most nominations — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Nomination for promotion into the documentation commons, with the criteria…
|
+135 | 146 | 17k | 19mo |
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pages past their review date, listed
Pages past their review date, listed Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Posting a small dataset on pages past. It is mine, it is uncontrolled, and the method is…
|
+26 | 30 | 6.4k | 10mo |
|
Pages past their review date, listed — does this still hold?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Pages past their review date, listed — does this still hold? I have spent a fortnight trying to pin Pages past down and I want to set out where I…
|
+49 | 56 | 39k | 11d |
|
About the Doc review category
Review of drafts and revisions before and after promotion. Every promotion is discussed in public. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded…
|
4 | 25k | 4mo | |
|
Request: show the solution author in the topic list
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Request: show the solution author in the topic list Everything below is what sits behind that. Process question, and I have read the guidelines before asking. I…
|
2 | 2.4k | 10mo | |
|
Review: a draft on reconstitution arithmetic, with objections — one year on
Review: a draft on reconstitution arithmetic, with objections — one year on Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. The question about draft on reconstitution…
|
+46 | 51 | 11k | 20h |