Post #3 put the caveat in the right place and I want to underline it.
Say what you have already ruled out. "It is not the diluent because I tried a second vial from a different box" saves three replies suggesting the diluent.
Happy to expand any of that if it is the useful part.
Chromatography questions need the method before anything else: column, gradient, wavelength, injection volume. A purity figure with no method attached cannot be discussed, only repeated.
Worth checking against a second source before it gets quoted onward.
On post #10 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.
Asking a follow-up: new topic or reply in the old one? If the answer depends on the previous post, reply. If it is a question that makes sense without the previous post, new topic. The second gets faster answers.
Filing this under things that are true until someone shows me otherwise.
Timeline questions need the timeline. Dates, in order, with what happened on each. "A while ago" and "recently" are the two least useful words in a question of this kind.
Two sources, same conclusion, and I could not rule out that one copied the other.
Post #32 put the caveat in the right place and I want to underline it.
The specific question in the title is more useful than you might think. A title like "a question I have" forces the person answering to guess what you want to know. A title with the actual question gets you an answer in two hours instead of two days.
A photograph of a vial is rarely useful and a photograph of a document usually is. Redact the identifiers before you post either.
Anyone who has looked at this more carefully, please correct the record.
Context that matters: compound, how long in, current dose, relevant history. Context that does not matter: how you feel, your hopes for the outcome, your medical history beyond what affects this specific question. The first set gets you answered. The second set makes the reply longer without making it better.
I would want the raw data before agreeing with my own summary of it.
Questions you cannot explain: "I cannot say why I am asking this, but is this compound stable at room temperature?" is more productive than no question at all. People here know that some questions cannot be asked in public and they will work with that constraint.
Read the full topic (82 posts)
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
About the How to Ask category
Framing a question so that it can actually be answered: what to include, what to leave out, and why we ask for units. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every…
|
+6 | 10 | 11k | 4mo |
|
What to include when your question involves a laboratory result
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: What to include when your question involves a laboratory result Question in the title. Context below, and I have tried to include the things people…
|
+8 | 12 | 14k | 2d |
|
Asking a follow-up: new topic or new reply?
Asking a follow-up: new topic or new reply? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Collecting what is known about asking a follow-up in one place, because it…
|
+68 | 73 | 40k | 1d |
|
How to ask about something you suspect is a bad idea
The question in the title: How to ask about something you suspect is a bad idea I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Question in the title. Context below, and I have tried to…
|
+81 | 87 | 16k | 2mo |
|
What to include when your question involves a chromatogram — one year on
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: What to include when your question involves a chromatogram — one year on Question in the title. Context below, and I have tried to include the…
|
+69 | 75 | 862 | 14d |
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Coming back to: Lurking for two months before posting: was that the right call?
The question in the title: Lurking for two months before posting: was that the right call? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Checking my reasoning rather than asking for a…
|
+28 | 32 | 3.3k | 11mo |
|
When a dose reduction is the correct response to a side effect
When a dose reduction is the correct response to a side effect — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. I have read the maintained page on this and I still have…
|
+38 | 42 | 2.7k | 19h |
|
A 5 mg vial and a 0.25 mg dose: the arithmetic in full
A 5 mg vial and a 0.25 mg dose: the arithmetic in full Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. 5 mg vial: setting out the arithmetic in full, because I have had to…
|
+124 | 141 | 16k | 2d |
|
New subcategory: rationale and scope
On the subject in the title: New subcategory: rationale and scope Working notes rather than a conclusion. Proposing that new subcategory deserves a maintained page rather than a recurring topic, and drafting…
|
+123 | 138 | 13k | 9mo |
|
Revisiting: Mobile reading experience on long topics
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: Mobile reading experience on long topics Everything below is what sits behind that. Bringing the figures rather than the impression, since a process…
|
+10 | 15 | 34k | 10h |