Small correction to my own earlier position on delayed gastric emptying and oral. I had the units the wrong way round, which changes the conclusion by an order of magnitude and therefore changes it entirely.
Delayed gastric emptying and oral medication absorption: which drugs matter posts 91–117
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1 · go to the accepted answer.
Bookmarking this. I will come back when I have something worth adding.
Oral medications with a narrow therapeutic index are the ones where that matters most. The interaction is about rate and timing rather than about the total absorbed, in most published cases.
Post #91 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
The confident answers on delayed gastric emptying and oral and the well-sourced answers are not the same answers, which is the most useful thing I have learned reading this category.
Adding the boring version of delayed gastric emptying and oral, because the interesting version keeps getting posted and the boring one is usually right.
Check the ordinary explanations, in order, and stop when one of them accounts for what you are seeing. Most of the time the second one does.
I had written a reply contradicting post #95 and deleted it. Here is what survived.
SGLT2 inhibitors: frequently co-administered and relevant to renal and cardiovascular discussion, not to interactions. There is no pharmacokinetic interaction of concern.
Noting that the question and the thing people usually mean by it are different.
Confirming post #95 from a second method, which matters more than confirming it from a second person.
I keep a log for delayed gastric emptying and oral specifically because my memory of it turned out to be systematically wrong in one direction. Six weeks of notes cost nothing and settled it.
Post #95 put the caveat in the right place and I want to underline it.
Alcohol is not contraindicated in the labelling and it does irritate a stomach that is already emptying slowly. There is no published interaction study, and the conservative reading is the obvious one.
Building on post #99 rather than restating it.
Delayed gastric emptying is the mechanism behind most of the plausible interactions in this class: anything whose absorption depends on how quickly the stomach empties can behave differently.
If that is already documented somewhere, ignore me and link it.
Oral contraceptive absorption has been studied specifically for some compounds in this class and the findings are compound-specific. Generalising from one to another is not supported.
The claim is narrower than it sounds, and deliberately so.
Collapsed as off-topic by two members at trust level 3 or above
Two sentences on delayed gastric emptying and oral and then I will stop, because the rest is speculation and the thread is better without mine.
What is documented is narrow. What is inferred from it is broad. The gap between them is where every argument here lives.
Coming back to post #99, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
A definition problem is doing most of the work in this delayed gastric emptying and oral discussion. Once the term is pinned down I suspect the disagreement mostly goes away and what is left is small.
Understood, and I withdraw the assumption I opened with.
Food interactions: most interactions are absorption interactions. Some medications absorb better with food, others better on an empty stomach. With an incretin agonist that already slows gastric emptying, food effects interact with the drug effect as well.
None of the above is medical advice and I am not qualified to give any.
Adding the measurement that post #103 says would settle it.
Separation timing versus clinically important interaction: a separation timing inconvenience (taking one medication 2 hours before or after another) is not the same as a clinically important interaction. Both can reduce absorption of one or the other, but only true interactions require active management.
If anyone can point at the primary source I would be grateful.
I had written a reply contradicting post #103 and deleted it. Here is what survived.
SGLT2 inhibitors: frequently co-administered and relevant to renal and cardiovascular discussion, not to interactions. There is no pharmacokinetic interaction of concern.
Delayed gastric emptying and oral: I would want to see the raw numbers rather than the summary before agreeing. Summaries lose exactly the information that would settle this.
Answering the question post #107 raises rather than the one it answers.
Delayed gastric emptying and oral has a well-known answer and a correct answer, and the interesting work is establishing that they are the same. Nobody has done that here yet.
A supplement is a drug for interaction purposes, and the fact that it is sold without a prescription tells you nothing about whether it interacts. The paperwork is usually worse rather than better.
Oral medications versus time: if you take an oral medication 30 minutes before semaglutide (which slows gastric emptying), the delayed stomach emptying affects when and where the oral medication is absorbed. Separating by a larger interval (1 to 2 hours) usually resolves this.
Nothing above should be read as advice about what anyone else should do.
Thyroid medications: semaglutide is associated with a slowing of gastric emptying, which might affect thyroid medication absorption if they are taken very close together. Separating them by a few hours is the conservative approach.
Collapsed as off-topic by two members at trust level 3 or above
I had written a reply contradicting post #112 and deleted it. Here is what survived.
The strongest argument against my own position on delayed gastric emptying and oral, stated as well as I can state it, since nobody else has yet.
This follows post #113 rather than contradicting it.
Where the delayed gastric emptying and oral reasoning breaks down for me is the step from the group result to the individual case. That step is almost never argued for.
A pharmacist can answer most questions in this subcategory in a few minutes with access to a proper interaction database, and that access is the thing a forum does not have.
It is a small point and it changes the answer, which is an awkward combination.
This topic was referenced in
- Common supplements people ask about, assessed one at a timePractice › Interactions · 107 replies
- Follow-up: Oral contraceptives and delayed emptying: what the data showsPractice › Interactions · 35 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Common supplements people ask about, assessed one at a time — a second dataset
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Common supplements people ask about, assessed one at a time — a second dataset Everything below is what sits behind that. A follow-up question about Common…
|
+97 | 104 | 15k | 3mo |
|
Alcohol: what is documented and what is folklore — the long version
Alcohol: what is documented and what is folklore — the long version — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A narrow question about Alcohol, deliberately narrow, because the…
|
+9 | 13 | 7.3k | 6mo |
|
Follow-up: Reading an interaction checker output critically
Reading an interaction checker output critically — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A follow-up question about Reading an interaction checker output that I did not know to…
|
+62 | 66 | 13k | 2d |
|
Anaesthesia and elective surgery: the aspiration question — does this still hold?
Anaesthesia and elective surgery: the aspiration question — does this still hold? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Asking about Anaesthesia and…
|
+23 | 27 | 5.6k | 17mo |
|
Reading an interaction checker output critically
On the subject in the title: Reading an interaction checker output critically Working notes rather than a conclusion. A question about reading an interaction checker output that I think has a definite answer,…
|
+144 | 152 | 3k | 4mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags metformin, needs a source, hypoglycaemia
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Anaesthesia and elective surgery: the aspiration question
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Anaesthesia and elective surgery: the aspiration question Everything below is what sits behind that. A narrow question about anaesthesia and elective surgery,…
|
+103 | 115 | 6.6k | 3mo |
|
Second pass at: Why this subcategory is stricter about sourcing than most
Second pass at: Why this subcategory is stricter about sourcing than most — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A comparison question rather than a question about one compound.…
|
+120 | 129 | 61k | 11mo |
|
Analytical identity of BPC-157: a 15-mer with a simple mass
Analytical identity of BPC-157: a 15-mer with a simple mass Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Something about analytical identity of BPC-157 does not reconcile…
|
+3 | 7 | 5.2k | 10mo |
|
Coming back to: When "no data" is the complete and final answer
When "no data" is the complete and final answer I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Asking about the compound itself rather than about a trial of it. I…
|
+77 | 82 | 12k | 11mo |
|
Follow-up: Reading an interaction checker output critically
Reading an interaction checker output critically — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A follow-up question about Reading an interaction checker output that I did not know to…
|
+62 | 66 | 13k | 2d |