This is the answer, and the reason it is the answer is the more useful part.
Half-life, steady state, and accumulation worked through — a second dataset
Adding a note of thanks rather than an opinion. I did not know most of that.
Post #23 put the caveat in the right place and I want to underline it.
Trying to state the Half-life position in a way that someone who disagrees would recognise as fair, because I do not think the version in this thread passes that test.
Reframing Half-life slightly, because I think the disagreement is about the question rather than the answer. If the question is "does it happen", yes. If it is "how often", nobody here knows.
Adding what did not work for me on Half-life, since the failures never get written up and they are half the useful information.
The accumulation ratio for weekly dosing with a week-long half-life is around two, which is why the concentration after several doses is roughly double the concentration after the first.
I would hold that lightly until someone with a larger sample weighs in.
My understanding of Half-life is a few years old and may have been superseded. If it has been, I would genuinely like to know rather than keep repeating it.
Where two sources give different half-lives, check the study design before deciding either is wrong. Sampling duration, assay sensitivity and population all move the number.
That distinction has done more work for me than anything else in this category.
Read the full topic (127 posts)
This topic was referenced in
- Follow-up: Subcutaneous absorption kinetics and site differencesPharmacology › Pharmacokinetics · 4 replies
- [2026 update] Clearance pathways and what renal impairment changesPharmacology › Pharmacokinetics · 69 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Half-life, steady state, and accumulation worked through
Half-life, steady state, and accumulation worked through Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Working through the kinetics rather than the pharmacology, because I…
|
+115 | 130 | 44k | 13mo |
|
Time to steady state after a dose increase
On the subject in the title: Time to steady state after a dose increase Working notes rather than a conclusion. Working through the kinetics rather than the pharmacology, because I think the confusion here is…
|
+151 | 163 | 9.7k | 21mo |
|
Peak-to-trough ratio at steady state for a weekly agent — the long version
Peak-to-trough ratio at steady state for a weekly agent — the long version Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A narrow question about Peak-to-trough ratio,…
|
+57 | 61 | 708 | 1d |
|
Follow-up: Subcutaneous absorption kinetics and site differences
Subcutaneous absorption kinetics and site differences — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A follow-up question about Subcutaneous absorption kinetics and site that I did not…
|
4 | 9.9k | 10mo | |
|
About the Pharmacokinetics category
Half-life, accumulation, steady state, albumin binding, and why weekly dosing works. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its author…
|
4 | 32k | 8mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags semaglutide, worked example, liraglutide
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The mass-error checker and its intended scope
The mass-error checker and its intended scope Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Proposing that mass-error checker deserves a maintained page rather than a…
|
+149 | 167 | 42k | 2y |
|
Semaglutide half-life: where the 165 to 184 hour figure comes from
Semaglutide half-life: where the 165 to 184 hour figure comes from — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Putting the numbers in the first post, because a question about a…
|
+128 | 145 | 3k | 4mo |
|
The decimal-point error, and the habit that catches it
The decimal-point error, and the habit that catches it Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. An honest uncertainty about decimal-point error rather than a…
|
+110 | 121 | 10k | 7mo |
|
Titles that describe the question, not the situation
Titles that describe the question, not the situation — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A narrow question about titles, deliberately narrow, because the broad version has…
|
+137 | 153 | 22k | 8mo |
|
Bug report: the reconstitution calculator and a rounding edge case
Bug report: the reconstitution calculator and a rounding edge case — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Posting the calculation with the inputs, so that somebody can disagree…
|
+68 | 72 | 28k | 4mo |