Severe gastroparesis and why this class is a poor fit — one year on

Severe gastroparesis and why this class is a poor fit — one year on — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable.

Asking about Severe gastroparesis directly, because I have read four threads on it and each answered a slightly different question.

The version I want answered is the narrow one: given the method stated below, is the result within what anyone else has seen? I am not asking what it means yet.

Method, numbers and the two assumptions I am aware of making are below. If the assumptions are wrong that is more useful to me than agreement.

My experience of Severe gastroparesis contradicts the reply above. I am posting it as a data point rather than as a refutation, because one person's experience is exactly that.

I had written a reply contradicting the opening post and deleted it. Here is what survived.

Nothing here is medical advice, and a contraindication question is one where the cost of a wrong forum answer is high.

Confirming post #3 from a second method, which matters more than confirming it from a second person.

Severe gastrointestinal disease interacts with a delayed-emptying mechanism and appears in the labelling for that reason.

Somebody's condition being on a list does not settle the decision, and somebody's condition being absent from one does not either.

Adding it in case it saves somebody the afternoon it cost me.

The reason Severe gastroparesis keeps being re-asked is that the answer is conditional and people quote it without the condition. It is not that the answer is unknown.

Severe gastroparesis is well covered in the tag pages, and the older discussions are better than the recent ones because they were argued out properly. Worth twenty minutes before adding to this one.

Thank you for the correction. I would rather find out here than later.

Worth separating two things that post #7 runs together.

Asking a pharmacist to check a contraindication takes minutes and is more reliable than any thread, including this one.

Anyone posting a contraindication claim should include the source. Without one it circulates and hardens.

If anyone has run this properly I would rather read that than my own guess.

Genuine question rather than a rhetorical one: has anyone here actually observed Severe gastroparesis, as opposed to read about it? The thread is long and I cannot tell.

Helpful, and easy to find again, which is half of what a good reply is.

Post #11 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.

I have no financial interest in anything named in this thread and I want to say so before I comment on Severe gastroparesis, because it is the sort of subject where it matters.

I read post #10 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.

Allergy to the specific compound: true allergy is rare but possible. Any prior allergic reaction to the same compound or to structurally similar peptides warrants caution.

That is the version I use. It may not be the version that is correct.