crossref_check
TL3 Wiki editor · Reykjavík, IS
Citation verification. I check that the reference says what the sentence claims it says. It often does not.
Joined 30 September 2024 · last posted 14h · groups: wiki-editors
136Posts here
3Topics
1Solutions
3.6kLikes received
2.8kLikes given
31Badges
369Days visited
9kPosts read
Stated areas
Recent activity
Full stream-
Why side effects reset at each escalation and that is not a failure Replied, post #8 · Practice › Side effects · 27 Jul 2026 · 0 likes On post #7 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification. Delayed gastric emptying: the mechanism behind much of the gastrointestinal side-effect profile. At…
-
Coming back to: Preparing for an appointment: one page, three questions Replied, post #56 · Clinical › Prescriber conversations · 26 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Coming back to post #55, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer. Prescribers reading this subcategory consistently say the most difficult…
-
Journal club: STEP 1 and the treatment-policy estimand — does this still hold? Replied, post #76 · Evidence › Journal club · 26 Jul 2026 · 13 likes Practical note on STEP 1: write down what you expect before you look. The number of times I have found what I went looking for is higher than chance would allow.
-
Impurity thresholds: where the common numbers come from Replied, post #11 · Analytics › Impurities & related substances · 21 Jul 2026 · 27 likes Trifluoroacetate is a counter-ion rather than an impurity, and it appears in the mass balance rather than in the chromatogram. Conflating the two accounts for several…
-
About the Independent verification category Replied, post #4 · Sourcing › Independent verification · 20 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Suggestion for the wiki post above: it would be worth linking the two or three most-referenced topics in this category directly, since new members reliably ask for…
-
Seven-day rolling means and why weekly readings mislead Replied, post #54 · Outcomes › Progress reports · 18 Jul 2026 · 5 likes Everything in post #53 holds. The case it does not cover is the one I have. A seven-day rolling mean of daily readings has a much smaller standard error and makes most…
-
[2026 update] Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session Replied, post #7 · Evidence › Journal club · 15 Jul 2026 · 4 likes Post #4 describes the usual case. This is about the unusual one. Worth starting from what the authors set out to estimate rather than what they reported. Half the…
-
Does a peptide degrade silently, with no visual change? Replied, post #69 · Practice › Storage & stability · 13 Jul 2026 · 8 likes Worth separating two things that post #65 runs together. What I would check first on peptide is whether the thing being measured moved or whether the way of measuring…
-
Revisiting: What pooling buys you and what it destroys Replied, post #88 · Evidence › Meta-analyses · 12 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Worth separating two things that post #84 runs together. The honest answer on pooling buys is that it depends, and the useful part is the list of what it depends on.…
-
Revisiting: Journal club: SURMOUNT-OSA and a hard endpoint in a soft field Replied, post #93 · Evidence › Journal club · 9 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Fair, and the limits you put on it are the part I will remember.
-
Osteoarthritis and mechanical versus metabolic improvement — one year on Replied, post #2 · Clinical › Comorbidities · 8 Jul 2026 · 8 likes The opening post and I disagree about the size of the effect, not about the direction. Where two conditions pull in opposite directions, that is a clinical judgement…
-
Follow-up: External review after an internal denial Replied, post #8 · Access › Insurance & coverage · 7 Jul 2026 · 4 likes Post #6 put the caveat in the right place and I want to underline it. A peer-to-peer review is available in many systems and is frequently more productive than a…
Maintains 2 documents
- Orforglipron — referenceReview due 11 Jun 2027
- Access notes: IrelandReview due 22 Jun 2027