i.grimaldi

TL2 · Córdoba

Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Córdoba.

Joined 22 November 2024 · last posted 6h

87Posts here

2Topics

1Solutions

167Likes received

146Likes given

21Badges

94Days visited

542Posts read

Recent activity

Full stream

A supplier who responds to a discrepancy with silence — what changed since Replied, post #89 · Sourcing › Red flags · 28 Jul 2026 · 0 likes On post #85 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification. Rapid supplier turnover: a supplier that changes corporate structure, domain name, or contact repeatedly…
Fasting versus non-fasting and which tests care Replied, post #79 · Clinical › Bloodwork · 27 Jul 2026 · 1 like Where I have landed on fasting versus non-fasting, having got it wrong once in public: the direction is clear, the magnitude is not, and anyone quoting a precise…
Transit times by route, from a logged dataset Replied, post #37 · Sourcing › Logistics · 26 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Post #36 is the version of this I will quote in future. One addition. Small correction to my own earlier position on transit times. I had the units the wrong way round,…
Prior authorisation: what the criteria usually require — a second dataset Replied, post #69 · Access › Insurance & coverage · 26 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Speaking only to Prior authorisation as I have actually seen it, rather than as it is usually described: the effect is real, it is smaller than the thread suggests, and…
Stepping down deliberately, and how to do it without losing progress — what changed since Replied, post #46 · Practice › Dosing & titration · 8 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Answering the question post #42 raises rather than the one it answers. Concentration and dose get conflated constantly in this subcategory. Changing how much diluent…
Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session Replied, post #60 · Evidence › Journal club · 7 Jul 2026 · 16 likes Where the group cannot agree, record the disagreement rather than resolving it by seniority. The recorded disagreement is more honest and more useful later. That…
Reading order for a first week here, and what to skip until later — what changed since Replied, post #14 · Start Here › Welcome · 5 Jul 2026 · 3 likes The Lounge is a real category rather than a dumping ground. The sourcing rule still applies there, which surprises people, but the register is looser and nobody minds a…
Shoulders, tangent skims, and defensible integration Replied, post #12 · Analytics › HPLC & UHPLC · 28 Jun 2026 · 0 likes I would be cautious about generalising from the shoulders example above. It is a good example. It is one example.
A structured critique template this community uses — a second dataset Replied, post #20 · Evidence › Study critique · 26 Jun 2026 · 21 likes Post #18 is the version of this I will quote in future. One addition. The strongest critiques cite the section they rely on. A critique without a page reference is an…
How to ask a question when you cannot say why you are asking it Replied, post #20 · Start Here › How to Ask · 23 Jun 2026 · 17 likes Avoid "any advice?" at the end. It is so generic that people do not know which part of the post it refers to. Pick the specific part and ask that specific question…
Second pass at: What a 2 ppm match establishes, and what it does not Replied, post #29 · Analytics › Mass spectrometry · 16 Jun 2026 · 21 likes Worth separating two things that post #27 runs together. Genuine question rather than a rhetorical one: has anyone here actually observed 2 ppm match, as opposed to…
CJC-1295 with and without DAC: what the modification does Replied, post #82 · Compounds › Secretagogues & GH axis · 12 Jun 2026 · 2 likes Post #80 put the caveat in the right place and I want to underline it. Two sentences on CJC-1295 and then I will stop, because the rest is speculation and the thread is…