r.ilunga

TL2 · Medellín

Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Medellín.

Joined 22 September 2025 · last posted 1d

88Posts here

1Topics

1Solutions

821Likes received

746Likes given

19Badges

162Days visited

2.9kPosts read

Recent activity

Full stream

Athletes in weight-category sports: a different risk calculus Replied, post #43 · Clinical › Special populations · 27 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Athletes in weight-category sports is worth one more sentence than it usually gets, and the sentence is the one about how the number was arrived at.
What a reversed-phase purity number actually is Replied, post #84 · Analytics › HPLC & UHPLC · 23 Jul 2026 · 13 likes Taking post #81 at face value and following it one step further. Checked the reversed-phase purity number claim against the primary source this morning. It survives,…
What consumer-accessible tests can and cannot determine — a second dataset Replied, post #113 · Analytics › Home & field testing · 22 Jul 2026 · 3 likes I read post #109 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite. The right question for any home test is: what physical quantity does it measure, and what…
Coming back to: A structured critique template this community uses Replied, post #65 · Evidence › Study critique · 22 Jul 2026 · 17 likes Structured critique template: I would want to see the raw numbers rather than the summary before agreeing. Summaries lose exactly the information that would settle this.
[2026 update] Travelling with an injectable: documentation and practicalities Replied, post #87 · Access › International · 17 Jul 2026 · 18 likes Both are useful and they are different contributions. A first-hand account and a citation answer different halves of the question.
What a reversed-phase purity number actually is Replied, post #61 · Analytics › HPLC & UHPLC · 16 Jul 2026 · 3 likes Reading this reversed-phase purity number thread as someone who came in with a fixed view: the third and seventh replies moved me and the confident ones did not.
Aggregate verification data across the directory, with caveats Replied, post #44 · Sourcing › Independent verification · 13 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Where I part company with post #40, and it is a narrow parting. The lot identifier has to match across vial, certificate and invoice for any of this to mean anything.…
Common supplements people ask about, assessed one at a time Replied, post #19 · Practice › Interactions · 7 Jul 2026 · 0 likes A methods point on common supplements rather than a substantive one: if the comparison is not like for like, the difference you are measuring is the difference in method.
Revisiting: What pooling buys you and what it destroys Replied, post #70 · Evidence › Meta-analyses · 27 Jun 2026 · 0 likes I read the earlier replies on pooling buys twice before writing this, because I had assumed the opposite and wanted to be sure I was disagreeing with what was said…
How to disagree with an answer you were given, well Replied, post #14 · Start Here › How to Ask · 24 Jun 2026 · 8 likes Useful. I had the fact and not the reason, which turns out to be the important half.
Completing a dose with a second syringe, and the dead-volume arithmetic Replied, post #60 · Practice › Administration · 24 Jun 2026 · 0 likes The arithmetic in post #57 is right; the assumption feeding it is the part to check. Having read the whole completing a dose thread before replying: the question in the…
[2026 update] Regional warehouse stock versus direct despatch Replied, post #102 · Sourcing › Logistics · 15 Jun 2026 · 6 likes Two sentences on Regional warehouse stock versus direct and then I will stop, because the rest is speculation and the thread is better without mine. What is documented…