The confident answers on Reconciling a supplier certificate and the well-sourced answers are not the same answers, which is the most useful thing I have learned reading this category.
Coming back to: Reconciling a supplier certificate with an independent result
Everything in post #6 holds. The case it does not cover is the one I have.
Source for the Reconciling a supplier certificate figure, since it was asked for. It is in the discussion rather than the abstract, which is why the version circulating is stronger than the paper is.
Reading the surrounding paragraph is worth the two minutes. The authors are more careful than their summarisers.
Post #12 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
Since Reconciling a supplier certificate keeps coming up, it should probably be a maintained page rather than a recurring thread. I am happy to draft it if someone with more direct experience will review it.
The format we ask for is compound, lot, testing service, method as reported, result, and the certificate figure for the same lot. A report missing any of those goes to the discussion rather than the record.
Noting that I have skin in this question and have tried to discount for it.
Post #28 put the caveat in the right place and I want to underline it.
Structured report format: compound, lot, independent testing service, method as reported, result, and the certificate figure for the same lot. One lot is one lot. It becomes a pattern at three or four, and it becomes a disputed record when asked and not explained.
Read the full topic (31 posts)
This topic was referenced in
- Reporting a discrepancy without making an allegationSourcing › Vendor reports · 89 replies
- Reporting a good result: why nobody bothers and why they should — one year onSourcing › Vendor reports · 27 replies
- Follow-up: Reporting a discrepancy without making an allegationSourcing › Vendor reports · 2 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The report format the maintainers ask for, and why each field is there
On the subject in the title: The report format the maintainers ask for, and why each field is there Working notes rather than a conclusion. Structured report rather than an opinion, following the format the…
|
4 | 6.3k | 1d | |
|
One lot is one lot: when a report becomes a pattern — the long version
One lot is one lot: when a report becomes a pattern — the long version — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Structured report rather than an opinion, following the format the…
|
+137 | 152 | 46k | 16mo |
|
Coming back to: Why our vendor pages link the storefront and mark it sponsored
Why our vendor pages link the storefront and mark it sponsored I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Reading back through what has been written here about…
|
2 | 22k | 8h | |
|
[2026 update] A report I filed that turned out to be wrong, and the correction
On the subject in the title: A report I filed that turned out to be wrong, and the correction Working notes rather than a conclusion. Structured report rather than an opinion, following the format the…
|
+15 | 19 | 18k | 2d |
|
Comparing documentation quality across the directory, tabulated
Comparing documentation quality across the directory, tabulated — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have spent a fortnight trying to pin comparing documentation quality…
|
+7 | 11 | 29k | 19h |
Related topics — sharing the tags documentation quality, certificate of analysis, batch & lot numbers
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Second pass at: Certificates issued by the seller versus by a laboratory
Second pass at: Certificates issued by the seller versus by a laboratory — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Two reports on the same lot, and I would like help deciding…
|
+81 | 92 | 20k | 18mo |
|
Documenting a payment dispute without naming and shaming — the long version
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Documenting a payment dispute without naming and shaming — the long version Everything below is what sits behind that. A narrow question about Documenting a payment…
|
2 | 32k | 1mo | |
|
Revisiting: Can a home kit substitute for a laboratory report? A careful no
Revisiting: Can a home kit substitute for a laboratory report? A careful no — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to disagree carefully with the settled view on…
|
+50 | 56 | 9.8k | 1d |
|
A field-by-field walk through a certificate of analysis
Posting this under the heading it deserves: A field-by-field walk through a certificate of analysis Everything below is what sits behind that. I have spent a fortnight trying to pin field-by-field walk…
|
+136 | 147 | 1.8k | 12mo |
|
Reading a home test result without over-claiming — what changed since
On the subject in the title: Reading a home test result without over-claiming — what changed since Working notes rather than a conclusion. What changes if the standard account of Reading a home test result is…
|
2 | 12k | 6mo |