The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Topic summary

Deletion sequences: expected mass shifts by residue — the long version

This is a generated summary. It shows the 5 most-liked posts from a topic of 26, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.
SC
s.cabreraTL25 Jul 2026#3
d.bakker, post #1: On the subject in the title: Deletion sequences: expected mass shifts by residue — the long version Working notes rather than a conclusion. Deletion sequences keeps being re-asked here and I think that is because the answer is conditional and the conditions never travel with it. Attempting to write the conditional version down properly.… Go to post

Off-target structures: if the sequence synthesis goes wrong, a completely different amino acid can be incorporated. The resulting off-target peptide is a structural isomer with the same mass but a different sequence. No chromatographic purity method detects this without a reference standard.

A single observation, in a thread that deserves better than single observations.

17 likes in reply to #1 23d
JW
journalclub_wrenTL3Regular9 Jul 2026#6
d.bakker, post #1: On the subject in the title: Deletion sequences: expected mass shifts by residue — the long version Working notes rather than a conclusion. Deletion sequences keeps being re-asked here and I think that is because the answer is conditional and the conditions never travel with it. Attempting to write the conditional version down properly.… Go to post

I read post #4 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.

Dimer and higher-order multimers: two or more peptide molecules bonded together. They appear at double the mass and higher. They may or may not separate from the monomer on HPLC depending on the method.

11 likes in reply to #1 19d
HA
h.agyemanTL210 Jul 2026#7

For anyone finding this later: the short answer on Deletion sequences is that it depends on one thing, and the rest of the thread is people identifying which thing.

24 likes 18d
MM
maintenance_modeTL3Regular19 Jul 2026#16

Post #15 is the version of this I will quote in future. One addition.

Deletion sequences (incomplete coupling during synthesis): lower in mass by one residue. Chromatographically they usually elute earlier or later depending on the residue's hydrophobicity. They are the most common impurity in solid-phase synthesis.

One more caveat and then I will stop qualifying: the sample selected itself.

31 likes 9d
K
KLindqvistTL4 Moderator22 Jul 2026#20

Peptide impurities that differ by a single residue are the hardest to resolve and the most likely to be biologically relevant, which is an unfortunate combination.

One case, stated as one case.

23 likes 6d

Read the full topic (26 posts)

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
About the Impurities & related substances category
Deletion sequences, oxidation, deamidation, aggregates, residual solvents, and counter-ion content. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded…
BNHSDSSDBW+6 10 50k 15h
Endotoxin and why it is a separate question from purity
Endotoxin and why it is a separate question from purity Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A question about endotoxin that I think has a definite answer, unlike…
DNSGMB 2 22k 4mo
Second pass at: Where impurities in solid-phase peptide synthesis come from
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Second pass at: Where impurities in solid-phase peptide synthesis come from Everything below is what sits behind that. Working notes on impurities in solid-phase…
SABJBPJSMS+47 51 3.3k 5mo
Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient? A narrow question about attributing a new peak, deliberately narrow, because the broad…
SHOWM 2 15k 18mo
Follow-up: Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient?
Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. A follow-up question about Attributing a new peak that I did…
KIABCSGV+15 19 671 17mo

Related topics — sharing the tags water content, endotoxin testing, data table

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
[2026 update] Area percent versus weight percent: the confusion that causes most arguments
On the subject in the title: Area percent versus weight percent: the confusion that causes most arguments Working notes rather than a conclusion. Proposing that Area percent versus weight percent deserves a…
BIISCJBSG+65 70 1.1k 16d
Cleaning a self-reported dataset and what you throw away
Cleaning a self-reported dataset and what you throw away — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Collecting what is known about cleaning a self-reported dataset in one place,…
SCFISC 2 28k 1d
Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient? A narrow question about attributing a new peak, deliberately narrow, because the broad…
SHOWM 2 15k 18mo
Solubility limits and what a cloudy solution is telling you
Solubility limits and what a cloudy solution is telling you — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. The question about solubility limits that I actually want answered is the…
SISSVKYRVS+11 15 34k 20h
Named, unnamed and unspecified impurities as regulatory categories — the long version
Named, unnamed and unspecified impurities as regulatory categories — the long version — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Two reports on the same lot, and I would like help…
PNTDHFEFJR+112 120 7.6k 5h