Dead volume: residual liquid in the hub and needle after withdrawal. Typical residual is 0.01 to 0.02 mL for an insulin syringe with a fixed needle. Accounting for it matters if precision matters.
Follow-up: Dead volume across syringe and needle combinations posts 91–99
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1 · go to the accepted answer.
I read post #90 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Syringe barrel size: common sizes are 0.3 mL, 0.5 mL, and 1.0 mL. Smaller barrels are more legible for small doses. Larger barrels hold larger volumes. Choose based on your dose.
Taking post #92 at face value and following it one step further.
Insulin syringe graduations: U-100 syringes are marked in units where 100 units = 1 mL. Always confirm your syringe is U-100. Confusion between insulin units and milligrams is the most common syringe error.
That is a description of practice, not a recommendation of it.
Following this. I have the same question and no better information than the first post.
Barrel size determines resolution and nothing else. A 0.3 mL barrel and a 1 mL barrel deliver the same volume equally well; the smaller one lets you see what you are delivering.
The strength of my opinion here exceeds the strength of my evidence.
Fixed versus detachable needles: insulin syringes usually have fixed needles (no dead volume loss to the hub). Luer-lock syringes use detachable needles (more dead volume). Fixed needles are preferred for small doses.
Worth separating two things that post #95 runs together.
Checked the Dead volume across syringe claim against the primary source this morning. It survives, with a narrower scope than the version quoted here. Posting the narrower scope.
The arithmetic in post #96 is right; the assumption feeding it is the part to check.
Genuine question rather than a rhetorical one: has anyone here actually observed Dead volume across syringe, as opposed to read about it? The thread is long and I cannot tell.
This topic was referenced in
- 0.3 mL versus 0.5 mL versus 1 mL barrels: resolution mattersDevices › Syringes & needles · 114 replies
- Reading U-100 graduations, with a conversion table — one year onDevices › Syringes & needles · 7 replies
- Second pass at: Gauge and length selection for subcutaneous injectionDevices › Syringes & needles · 58 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[2026 update] 0.3 mL versus 0.5 mL versus 1 mL barrels: resolution matters
On the subject in the title: 0.3 mL versus 0.5 mL versus 1 mL barrels: resolution matters Working notes rather than a conclusion. A follow-up question about 0.3 ml versus 0.5 ml that I did not know to ask the…
|
+108 | 124 | 27k | 2mo |
|
Dead volume across syringe and needle combinations
On the subject in the title: Dead volume across syringe and needle combinations Working notes rather than a conclusion. Something about dead volume across syringe does not reconcile and I would like a second…
|
+72 | 80 | 28k | 5mo |
|
Second pass at: Gauge and length selection for subcutaneous injection
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Second pass at: Gauge and length selection for subcutaneous injection Everything below is what sits behind that. The question about Gauge and length selection that…
|
+50 | 58 | 14k | 15mo |
|
A ten-fold dose error caught before injection
A ten-fold dose error caught before injection — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Trying to work out what would count as evidence on ten-fold dose error caught, before…
|
+95 | 103 | 26k | 10mo |
|
Reading U-100 graduations, with a conversion table — what changed since
Reading U-100 graduations, with a conversion table — what changed since Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. What changes if the standard account of Reading U-100…
|
2 | 10k | 2mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags syringe units, worked example, subcutaneous injection
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Second pass at: Choosing a concentration on purpose rather than by accident
Second pass at: Choosing a concentration on purpose rather than by accident Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Posting a small dataset on Choosing a…
|
+49 | 54 | 6k | 4mo |
|
What to include when your question involves arithmetic
What to include when your question involves arithmetic — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Counting it rather than describing it, because the count is the…
|
2 | 3.1k | 7mo | |
|
Follow-up: "Should I double up?" — answered once, at length, calmly
On the subject in the title: "Should I double up?" — answered once, at length, calmly Working notes rather than a conclusion. A practical question that I suspect has a boring answer, which is why I could not…
|
2 | 9.7k | 5mo | |
|
Regression to the mean in progress reports
On the subject in the title: Regression to the mean in progress reports Working notes rather than a conclusion. Something about regression does not reconcile and I would like a second pair of eyes before I…
|
+30 | 34 | 49k | 12mo |
|
[2026 update] Dose numbers across compounds are not on the same scale
On the subject in the title: Dose numbers across compounds are not on the same scale Working notes rather than a conclusion. A narrow question about Dose numbers across compounds, deliberately narrow, because…
|
+14 | 18 | 1.2k | 13mo |