The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Topic summary

Journal club: semaglutide in MASH, and surrogate endpoints

This is a generated summary. It shows the 5 most-liked posts from a topic of 29, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.
HA
h.agyemanTL215 Mar 2026#11
j.bhattacharya, post #6: The confident answers on semaglutide in MASH and the well-sourced answers are not the same answers, which is the most useful thing I have learned reading this category. Go to post

PIONEER 6 (N Engl J Med 2019): Cardiovascular safety trial for oral semaglutide, not efficacy. Non-inferiority for safety was met. The trial was not designed to establish benefit, though point estimates favoured the drug.

I am confident about the direction and much less about the magnitude.

21 likes in reply to #6 4mo
AV
a.vukovicTL217 Apr 2026#15
lyophil_margin, post #9: Reading back through the semaglutide in MASH threads from last year, the same three questions come up every time and only one of them has ever been answered properly. That seems like a documentation gap rather than a knowledge gap. Go to post

The bit of semaglutide in MASH that nobody enjoys is that the answer changes depending on what you are trying to decide with it. Say what the decision is and the thread will converge.

28 likes in reply to #9 3mo
YR
y.ramosTL28 Jun 2026#22
m.yildiz, post #10: SURMOUNT-OSA (N Engl J Med 2024): Tirzepatide in obstructive sleep apnoea, using an objective physiological endpoint. Notable because soft endpoints are avoided. Two parallel trials addressed the confounder directly. The confident version of this sentence would be wrong, so here is the hedged one. Go to post

Answering the question post #20 raises rather than the one it answers.

The baseline characteristics table is the single most useful page for the questions that get asked here, because it tells you who the result applies to.

30 likes in reply to #10 2mo
G
GDashwoodTL3Regular30 Jun 2026#25

Adding a data point of agreement rather than a data point.

21 likes 28d
BP
b.petrovTL227 Jul 2026#29

SELECT (N Engl J Med 2023): Semaglutide cardiovascular outcomes without diabetes. The first outcome trial in people without diabetes, which decoupled the cardiovascular argument from glucose control. Read the absolute numbers, not just the relative reduction.

That holds under the stated conditions and I have stated them.

28 likes 15h

Read the full topic (29 posts)

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session
On the subject in the title: Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session Working notes rather than a conclusion. Bringing a claim rather than a paper, because the claim is the thing circulating. The…
NAFPALVSFT+114 125 2.5k 23h
Journal club: SURMOUNT-OSA and a hard endpoint in a soft field
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Journal club: SURMOUNT-OSA and a hard endpoint in a soft field Everything below is what sits behind that. Collecting what is known about SURMOUNT-OSA in one place,…
CIRCBPMN+47 51 617 16mo
[2026 update] Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session
Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Bringing a claim rather than a paper, because the claim is the thing circulating.…
NVAVRJVBV+5 9 4.2k 1d
Journal club: orforglipron phase 2 and the non-peptide question
Journal club: orforglipron phase 2 and the non-peptide question Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Orforglipron phase 2, and specifically the version of it that…
KBLKSSJLB+120 132 13k 1d
Journal club: STEP 1 and the treatment-policy estimand — does this still hold?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Journal club: STEP 1 and the treatment-policy estimand — does this still hold? Working notes on STEP 1 rather than a conclusion. I would rather…
GKRCDALB+70 76 4.8k 15h

Related topics — sharing the tags randomised trial, journal club, effect size

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
What the published dose-response for semaglutide actually looks like above 2.4 mg
What the published dose-response for semaglutide actually looks like above 2.4 mg — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. I would like to know what people here…
FEFTRW 2 10k 3mo
The SOUL trial and oral semaglutide cardiovascular outcomes
Posting this under the heading it deserves: The SOUL trial and oral semaglutide cardiovascular outcomes Everything below is what sits behind that. Collecting what is known about SOUL trial and oral…
YMNSMH 2 7.1k 9h
Journal club: the retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper
Journal club: the retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Collecting what is known about retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper in one place, because…
LFVDAERASV+7 11 33k 7mo
Why fasting instructions for oral semaglutide are not optional advice — does this still hold?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Why fasting instructions for oral semaglutide are not optional advice — does this still hold? A methods question rather than a substantive one,…
MVEBATJSI+98 106 3.1k 10mo
Comparing the STEP programme populations: who was actually enrolled
Comparing the STEP programme populations: who was actually enrolled Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Two things I would like separated before anyone answers…
LVBPNN 2 7.5k 2mo