The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Topic summary

Pages past their review date, listed

This is a generated summary. It shows the 5 most-liked posts from a topic of 31, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.
CL
coldchain_liuTL3Regular24 Jun 2025#1

Pages past their review date, listed Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did.

Posting a small dataset on pages past. It is mine, it is uncontrolled, and the method is stated so it can be discounted appropriately.

What I would like is not agreement but a second dataset collected by someone with no stake in mine. If one exists I would rather read it than argue for this one.

29 likes 13mo
SH
s.hartmannTL28 Jul 2025#4

Taking the opening post at face value and following it one step further.

On pages past, I would rather understate and be corrected upward than overstate and be quoted. That is a house style here and it is a good one.

30 likes 13mo
TV
t.vasquezTL4 Moderator6 Aug 2025#14
Staff post. Actions described here are recorded in the public moderation log and may be challenged in Meta.

That is the most useful kind of report and the hardest to notice. Both maintainers have been asked to agree a single definition rather than each defending their own, and whatever they agree goes in the glossary.

25 likes 12mo
IA
i.aranda_esTL2Translator · ES18 Aug 2025#19

Redundancy: if two maintained pages cover largely the same ground, consolidation might improve clarity. Pointing out redundancy helps maintainers see the issue.

Not the whole picture, but the part of it I can speak to.

26 likes 11mo
ZN
z.nakamuraTL227 Aug 2025#23

Careful with that. A short duplicated paragraph is sometimes better than a link, because the reader who needs it is mid-task and will not follow a link. The test is whether it can drift out of step.

Reading it again, the caveat matters more than the finding.

28 likes 11mo

Read the full topic (31 posts)

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
[2026 update] Reverting an edit that had no revision note
Reverting an edit that had no revision note — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Collecting what is known about Reverting an edit in one place, because it is currently spread…
NRSMPWAVBN+8 12 54k 12mo
[2026 update] Citation sweep results: how many references did not say what was claimed
Citation sweep results: how many references did not say what was claimed Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. What changes if the standard account of Citation…
ATPPMVNGMO+41 45 47k 12mo
Pages past their review date, listed — does this still hold?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Pages past their review date, listed — does this still hold? I have spent a fortnight trying to pin Pages past down and I want to set out where I…
GPAINRLDEF+49 56 39k 11d
A revision dispute resolved on the topic rather than in the history — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: A revision dispute resolved on the topic rather than in the history — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting a small dataset on revision dispute…
FPIGRIDLA+45 50 33k 20mo
Reverting an edit that had no revision note
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Reverting an edit that had no revision note Everything below is what sits behind that. Reverting an edit: setting out the arithmetic in full, because I have had to…
GPAVDAMN+17 21 4.5k 12mo

Related topics — sharing the tags wiki post, maintainership, review date

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Guidelines revision: what changed and why — does this still hold?
Guidelines revision: what changed and why — does this still hold? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. I was wrong about Guidelines revision in a thread…
QZJCAR 2 58k 7mo
Guidelines revision: what changed and why
Guidelines revision: what changed and why Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I was wrong about guidelines revision in a thread last spring and I would like to…
MPTTAHECKH+125 142 1.7k 2y
[2026 update] Splitting an overlong document into two
Splitting an overlong document into two — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Collecting what is known about Splitting an overlong document in one place, because it is…
NGANABANLG+44 48 7k 9mo
Revisiting: Maintainer handover: how it works
Revisiting: Maintainer handover: how it works Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Maintainer handover keeps being re-asked here and I think that is because the…
SCNITPESUC+53 57 664 4mo
Scheduled maintenance and what will be unavailable
Scheduled maintenance and what will be unavailable Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Collecting what is known about scheduled maintenance in one place, because…
KBVNKFKIC+120 128 25k 15mo