The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Meta · Site feedback

Tag proliferation and whether we should prune — what changed since

SC
s.chowdhuryTL3Regular30 Dec 2025#1

Tag proliferation and whether we should prune — what changed since — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable.

What changes if the standard account of Tag proliferation is wrong? I ask because I have been treating it as settled and I noticed this week that I could not say why.

Working through the consequences rather than the evidence, since others here are better placed on the evidence.

0 likes 7mo
HK
h.koodziejTL2Member7 Jan 2026#2

I would rather this thread reach "we do not know" about Tag proliferation than reach a confident answer that nobody can support when asked.

22 likes 7mo
SS
s.solbergTL214 Jan 2026#3
h.koodziej, post #2: I would rather this thread reach "we do not know" about Tag proliferation than reach a confident answer that nobody can support when asked. Go to post

Suggestion rather than complaint: the vendor pages carry a review date, and topics do not. A topic that has been read by a maintainer recently is a different thing from one nobody has looked at since 2024.

Happy to be corrected if someone holds better data than mine.

10 likes in reply to #2 6mo
VK
v.klausenTL3Regular19 Jan 2026#4

Thank you for the correction. I would rather find out here than later.

3 likes 6mo
HF
h.fonsecaTL225 Jan 2026#5

Tag proliferation came up in a thread eighteen months ago and was answered well. I cannot find it, which is itself the problem, so here is the reconstruction.

0 likes 6mo
ID
integrator_draftTL3Regular30 Jan 2026#6
h.fonseca, post #5: Tag proliferation came up in a thread eighteen months ago and was answered well. I cannot find it, which is itself the problem, so here is the reconstruction. Go to post

I read the earlier replies on Tag proliferation twice before writing this, because I had assumed the opposite and wanted to be sure I was disagreeing with what was said rather than what I expected.

30 likes in reply to #5 6mo
PF
p.friskTL23 Feb 2026#7
v.klausen, post #4: Thank you for the correction. I would rather find out here than later. Go to post

Moderation decisions: if you disagree with a moderation decision, raising it here gives it visibility. Staff will reconsider if you make a substantive case.

For what it is worth, the same held on the two occasions I checked.

15 likes in reply to #4 6mo
VM
v.milanoviTL3Regular8 Feb 2026#8

Taking post #7 at face value and following it one step further.

Guideline clarity: if the guidelines are unclear or seem to be applied inconsistently, post the specific situation so staff can clarify or reconsider.

6 likes 6mo
FP
f.petrovTL212 Feb 2026#9

Reporting rather than recommending, on Tag proliferation. What happened is above. Whether it should have is a different question and not one I am qualified to answer.

23 likes 5mo
AS
a.stephanopoulosTL3Regular17 Feb 2026 · edited#10

Reporting rather than complaining: the tag filter and the category filter combine in a way I did not expect. Selecting both narrows to the intersection, which is correct, but reads as an empty result rather than a narrow one.

If the premise is wrong, everything after it is decoration.

11 likes 5mo

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Follow-up: The topic list is dense — is that deliberate?
The question in the title: The topic list is dense — is that deliberate? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. A follow-up question about topic list that I did not know to ask…
NGMOCISLEM 4 23k 12mo
Tag proliferation and whether we should prune
On the subject in the title: Tag proliferation and whether we should prune Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have spent a fortnight trying to pin tag proliferation down and I want to set out where I…
ALADAW 2 11k 11mo
Mobile reading experience on long topics
Mobile reading experience on long topics Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Process question, and I have read the guidelines before asking. I understand the…
RVNAI 2 14k 4h
Why the timeline is on the right and not the left — what changed since
Why the timeline is on the right and not the left — what changed since I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. What changes if the standard account of…
DTRFENKAK+77 81 4k 2d
About the Site feedback category
Bugs, friction, and the parts of the site that do not work the way you expected. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its author and…
JMSLVDAHKR 4 54k 10mo

Related topics — sharing the tags site feedback, guidelines, moderation

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Follow-up: A supplier that answers analytical questions with restated claims
A supplier that answers analytical questions with restated claims — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A follow-up question about supplier that I did not know to ask the first…
CCPYESTCB+74 82 2.8k 6mo
Aggregated purity results across four services, with caveats
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Aggregated purity results across four services, with caveats Everything below is what sits behind that. Aggregated purity results across four, from the point of…
CPEKLMHK 3 24k 9mo
Lurking for two months before posting: was that the right call?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Lurking for two months before posting: was that the right call? Question in the title. Context below, and I have tried to include the things people…
HONSMSVSJT+66 71 11k 8mo
[2026 update] Are there stupid questions here? A staff answer, at length
Are there stupid questions here? A staff answer, at length — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Counting it rather than describing it, because the count is…
SLMNOAHRC+36 40 2.4k 1mo
The anatomy of a question that gets answered within an hour — does this still hold?
The anatomy of a question that gets answered within an hour — does this still hold? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Question in the title. Context…
KOKBSFLCAS+19 23 40k 14d