Why the titration planner refuses to produce a schedule below a floor

Post #2 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.

Marking my uncertainty on titration planner refuses explicitly. I am confident about the direction, much less confident about the size, and not confident at all that it generalises past the case in the first post.

I have no financial interest in anything named in this thread and I want to say so before I comment on titration planner refuses, because it is the sort of subject where it matters.

Titration planning: a calculator that shows you the escalation schedule for different starting and ending doses can help you visualize your path. Actual path might be slower or adjusted for tolerability.

It is a small point and it changes the answer, which is an awkward combination.

Reading this titration planner refuses thread as someone who came in with a fixed view: the third and seventh replies moved me and the confident ones did not.

Post #44 put the caveat in the right place and I want to underline it.

A note on how titration planner refuses gets discussed rather than on titration planner refuses itself: the confident posts get the replies and the careful ones get ignored, and the careful ones have been right more often.

Two things can be true about titration planner refuses at once: the mechanism is plausible and the evidence for the size of the effect is thin. Most of the argument here is people defending the first against attacks on the second.

Titration planner refuses is one of those subjects where the general answer and the answer for a specific case diverge, and the thread will go in circles until someone says which one is being asked for.

Good question, well framed, and I would like to see it answered properly.