h.frisk
TL2 · Aalborg
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Aalborg.
Joined 3 March 2025 · last posted 5d
82Posts here
0Topics
0Solutions
644Likes received
535Likes given
19Badges
183Days visited
2.5kPosts read
Recent activity
Full stream-
Seven-day rolling means and why weekly readings mislead Replied, post #87 · Outcomes › Progress reports · 23 Jul 2026 · 0 likes The bit of seven-day rolling that nobody enjoys is that the answer changes depending on what you are trying to decide with it. Say what the decision is and the thread…
-
What a certificate commits its issuer to — one year on Replied, post #115 · Analytics › COA interpretation · 22 Jul 2026 · 31 likes A chromatogram supplied as a small image is legible for peak shape and not for baseline detail. That is enough to sanity-check an integration and not enough to…
-
Revisiting: Hepatic effects of glucagon receptor agonism: the mechanistic worry Replied, post #9 · Compounds › Retatrutide · 21 Jul 2026 · 30 likes Helpful, and short, which on this subject is harder than long.
-
Rewriting my first post: a before-and-after, with commentary — what changed since Replied, post #13 · Start Here › How to Ask · 5 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Number your questions if there is more than one. It sounds fussy. It means the answer can be numbered back, and you find out which one nobody addressed. This has been…
-
Journal club: STEP 1 and the treatment-policy estimand — does this still hold? Replied, post #56 · Evidence › Journal club · 2 Jul 2026 · 16 likes Having read the whole STEP 1 thread before replying: the question in the first post has not actually been answered yet, and three of us have answered a nearby one…
-
Revisiting: How this community labels and discusses unrefereed work Replied, post #13 · Evidence › Preprints · 2 Jul 2026 · 18 likes Small correction to my own earlier position on community labels. I had the units the wrong way round, which changes the conclusion by an order of magnitude and…
-
Revisiting: The best-written scientific paper you have read Replied, post #26 · Lounge › Off topic · 11 Jun 2026 · 0 likes On best-written scientific paper I would separate what is worth knowing from what is worth acting on. The first list is long and the second is short, and conflating…
-
[2026 update] A vial that will not fully dissolve: what to check and in what order Replied, post #101 · Practice › Reconstitution · 10 Jun 2026 · 27 likes Agreed, and I will stop repeating the version of this I had been repeating.
-
CJC-1295 with and without DAC: what the modification does Replied, post #73 · Compounds › Secretagogues & GH axis · 2 Jun 2026 · 4 likes Reading a rodent study on a secretagogue without over-extrapolating: rodent studies can show a mechanism is plausible. They cannot show magnitude of effect in humans or…
-
Prescription requirements and telehealth models — a second dataset Replied, post #48 · Sourcing › Regulatory · 31 May 2026 · 2 likes An update on my earlier Prescription requirements and telehealth models post: the pattern held for another six weeks and then stopped, which I did not predict and…
-
[2026 update] Regional warehouse stock versus direct despatch Replied, post #82 · Sourcing › Logistics · 27 May 2026 · 6 likes At what point is a parcel genuinely a problem: if it was despatched weeks ago and there has been no update for days at customs, it might be held or lost. Days of delay…
-
Transporting a vial for a weekend away — a second dataset Replied, post #54 · Practice › Storage & stability · 15 May 2026 · 0 likes Temperature excursions in transit are common and are not all equal. A few hours warm is a different event from three days warm, and neither is visible in the vial on…