revision_history
TL3 Wiki editor · Edinburgh, UK
I read diffs. If you edited a wiki page without saying why in the revision note, I will ask.
Joined 4 January 2025 · last posted 2d · groups: wiki-editors
139Posts here
3Topics
0Solutions
952Likes received
927Likes given
27Badges
152Days visited
2.8kPosts read
Stated areas
Recent activity
Full stream-
Tracking a shortage from primary sources rather than rumour Replied, post #124 · Access › Shortages · 26 Jul 2026 · 26 likes Where I part company with post #122, and it is a narrow parting. Shortage predictions: regulators and suppliers issue shortage alerts before they become acute. Checking…
-
[2026 update] Detection wavelength and why 214 nm and 280 nm disagree Replied, post #67 · Analytics › HPLC & UHPLC · 25 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Detection wavelength: 214 nm detects the peptide bond and is relatively insensitive to composition. 280 nm detects aromatic residues and is strongly…
-
Revisiting: The best-written scientific paper you have read Replied, post #113 · Lounge › Off topic · 24 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Agreed on best-written scientific paper, with one qualification that I think matters. The reasoning holds for the case as described. Change the starting assumption and…
-
Angle of injection and whether 90 degrees is always right — the long version Replied, post #53 · Practice › Administration · 23 Jul 2026 · 0 likes A genuinely late dose: the labelling generally says that if the next dose is more than a couple of days away, take it as soon as you notice. If the next dose is close,…
-
Reflectance and photometric devices: precision in practice — a second dataset Replied, post #79 · Analytics › Home & field testing · 22 Jul 2026 · 1 like Picking up post #78: that is the part I would want checked first. Ultraviolet absorbance at 280 nanometres estimates concentration for peptides containing aromatic…
-
Follow-up: Reading an interaction checker output critically Replied, post #60 · Practice › Interactions · 22 Jul 2026 · 21 likes Agreed on Reading an interaction checker output, with one qualification that I think matters. The reasoning holds for the case as described. Change the starting…
-
Coming back to: Time to steady state after a dose increase Replied, post #104 · Pharmacology › Pharmacokinetics · 18 Jul 2026 · 6 likes Worth separating two things that post #102 runs together. Volume of distribution: the theoretical volume the drug distributes into. For albumin-binding compounds,…
-
Spreadsheets: an appreciation — what changed since Replied, post #104 · Lounge › Off topic · 18 Jul 2026 · 26 likes Since we are being unserious: the number of times I have watched a thread turn on somebody quietly asking "at what wavelength" is now genuinely funny. Old habit: I…
-
Why the Start Here categories exist, and what they are not for Replied, post #2 · Start Here › Welcome · 15 Jul 2026 · 9 likes The tag pages are usually a better entry point than the categories for a first read. A tag cuts across categories, so following one shows you how the same subject is…
-
When a dose reduction is the correct response to a side effect Replied, post #39 · Practice › Dosing & titration · 15 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Clear enough that I do not think I have a follow-up, which is unusual.
-
How much context is too much context in a first post? Replied, post #64 · Start Here › How to Ask · 9 Jul 2026 · 14 likes Building on post #61 rather than restating it. Context that matters: compound, how long in, current dose, relevant history. Context that does not matter: how you feel,…
-
Here for the analytics and not much else Replied, post #11 · Lounge › Introductions · 9 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Welcome aboard. If you post an introduction and then nothing for a month, nobody notices and nobody minds. Come back when there is something you want to know. I would…