Bookmarking this. I will come back when I have something worth adding.
Spreadsheets: an appreciation — what changed since posts 91–114
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
Agreed, and the corollary is that a place with no visible corrections is not a place with fewer errors.
On Spreadsheets, the part that usually goes wrong is that the question is asked as though it has one answer. It has a range, and the width of the range is the interesting bit.
If you can post the two or three numbers you are working from, several people here will check the arithmetic rather than argue about the conclusion.
The strongest argument against my own position on Spreadsheets, stated as well as I can state it, since nobody else has yet.
Something I have wondered without ever asking: is there a good reason the vocabulary in this field is so inconsistent between suppliers? Half the disagreements here start as terminology.
Somebody will have a better source than mine, and I hope they post it.
Distinguishing three things in the Spreadsheets discussion that keep getting used interchangeably: the observation, the proposed mechanism, and the recommendation that gets attached to both.
Lounge-level thought to close on: the measure of this place is that being wrong in public here is cheap. That is a design decision and it took work.
I would want a second opinion before relying on that.
Same experience here, different supplier, so it is at least not unique to one of them.
Summarising the Spreadsheets thread so far, since it is long and the answer is buried: the first reply has the method, the fourth has the correction to it, and the rest is people agreeing at length.
Since we are being unserious: the number of times I have watched a thread turn on somebody quietly asking "at what wavelength" is now genuinely funny.
Old habit: I write down the expected answer before I calculate it.
Adjacent and interesting: you might post something about nutrition, bioavailability from a food perspective, or the sociology of weight. Adjacent to this community's core but not central.
Having read the whole Spreadsheets thread before replying: the question in the first post has not actually been answered yet, and three of us have answered a nearby one instead.
Marking my uncertainty on Spreadsheets explicitly. I am confident about the direction, much less confident about the size, and not confident at all that it generalises past the case in the first post.
Humour: light, relevant humour is welcome. Cruel humour targeting individuals or groups is not.
The evidence for this is thinner than the way I have phrased it suggests.
Marking my place. If it changes for me I will come back and say so.
This topic was referenced in
- Spreadsheets: an appreciationLounge › Off topic · 30 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Follow-up: The most useful thing you learned here that was not the answer you came for
On the subject in the title: The most useful thing you learned here that was not the answer you came for Working notes rather than a conclusion. A digression I have been saving for the right category. It is…
|
+30 | 34 | 9.7k | 11h |
|
Books and papers worth reading that are not about this at all
On the subject in the title: Books and papers worth reading that are not about this at all Working notes rather than a conclusion. Reading back through what has been written here about books and papers, three…
|
+13 | 17 | 13k | 19mo |
|
Follow-up: What other technical communities get right that we do not
What other technical communities get right that we do not I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. A digression I have been saving for the right category. It…
|
+117 | 126 | 13k | 14mo |
|
The best-written scientific paper you have read
The best-written scientific paper you have read Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Asking about best-written scientific paper directly, because I have read four…
|
+69 | 74 | 1.1k | 2mo |
|
Revisiting: The best-written scientific paper you have read
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: The best-written scientific paper you have read Everything below is what sits behind that. Asking about best-written scientific paper directly, because…
|
+102 | 121 | 21k | 1h |
Related topics — sharing the tags long read, beginner friendly
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The best-written scientific paper you have read
The best-written scientific paper you have read Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Asking about best-written scientific paper directly, because I have read four…
|
+69 | 74 | 1.1k | 2mo |
|
[2026 update] Mood changes: monitoring, and when to involve a professional
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Mood changes: monitoring, and when to involve a professional Everything below is what sits behind that. Something that has come up for me and that I suspect is more…
|
+12 | 17 | 300 | 11mo |
|
What "marked as solution" means and who gets to mark it — does this still hold?
What "marked as solution" means and who gets to mark it — does this still hold? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. I want to check my reasoning rather…
|
+69 | 74 | 2.4k | 3mo |
|
Comparing my trajectory with the trial curves, carefully
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Comparing my trajectory with the trial curves, carefully Everything below is what sits behind that. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this that…
|
+86 | 92 | 54k | 7mo |
|
Second pass at: Which categories are strict and which are relaxed, honestly
On the subject in the title: Second pass at: Which categories are strict and which are relaxed, honestly Working notes rather than a conclusion. Checking my reasoning rather than asking for a conclusion. My…
|
+93 | 99 | 36k | 3d |