The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Topic summary

[2026 update] Journal club: SURPASS-2 and the semaglutide 1 mg comparator

This is a generated summary. It shows the 9 most-liked posts from a topic of 139, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.
ED
e.dalgleishTL3Regular28 Sep 2024#1

Journal club: SURPASS-2 and the semaglutide 1 mg comparator Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did.

Session topic: SURPASS-2 (N Engl J Med, 2021). Please read it before posting; the discussion is much better when everyone has.

The question I would like us to start with is what the trial set out to estimate, rather than what it found. Once that is on the table we can talk about whether the design could have answered it, and only then about the numbers.

Specific things I would like covered: the population and how far it generalises, how discontinuation was handled, whether the comparator was a fair one, and what the absolute rather than relative effect looks like.

I will summarise at the end and the summary will feed the relevant digest page.

43 likes 22mo
NR
n.rowntreeTL3Regular8 Oct 2024#5

The opening post describes the usual case. This is about the unusual one.

Reading order that works for these sessions: registry entry, methods, baseline table, primary result, then abstract last. Reading the abstract first anchors everything that follows.

31 likes 22mo
P
PSundbergTL2Member1 Dec 2024#47

Post #44 and I disagree about the size of the effect, not about the direction.

The arithmetic on SURPASS-2 is the easy part and it is where the errors are, which is an uncomfortable combination. Show your working and someone will catch it.

30 likes 20mo
PN
priorauth_notesTL2Regular3 Dec 2024#49

SELECT (N Engl J Med 2023): Semaglutide cardiovascular outcomes without diabetes. The first outcome trial in people without diabetes, which decoupled the cardiovascular argument from glucose control. Read the absolute numbers, not just the relative reduction.

29 likes 20mo
CL
coldchain_liuTL3Regular11 Dec 2024 · edited#57

This is the sort of exchange that makes the archive worth searching.

32 likes 20mo
FE
footnote_entryTL3Regular18 Dec 2024#64
b.nwosu, post #11: An observation about SURPASS-2 that I cannot explain and am posting anyway, on the principle that unexplained observations are more useful public than private. Go to post

Fine by me. I had wanted a stronger conclusion and there is not one available.

30 likes in reply to #11 19mo
ME
m.eriksenTL226 Dec 2024#72

I had written a reply contradicting post #70 and deleted it. Here is what survived.

PIONEER 6 (N Engl J Med 2019): Cardiovascular safety trial for oral semaglutide, not efficacy. Non-inferiority for safety was met. The trial was not designed to establish benefit, though point estimates favoured the drug.

32 likes 19mo
F
FairweatherTL2Member17 Jan 2025#95
i.broberg, post #90: One caution on SURPASS-2: everything above assumes the underlying documentation is what it claims to be. That assumption is doing real work and is rarely stated. Go to post

What I would tell a new member reading about SURPASS-2 for the first time: the confident posts are not the reliable ones, and the reliable ones are longer.

33 likes in reply to #90 18mo
ST
slow_titratorTL2Regular23 Feb 2025#137

SELECT (N Engl J Med 2023): Semaglutide cardiovascular outcomes without diabetes. The first outcome trial in people without diabetes, which decoupled the cardiovascular argument from glucose control. Read the absolute numbers, not just the relative reduction.

Not a strong opinion, just a consistent one.

29 likes 17mo

Read the full topic (139 posts)

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Journal club: STEP 8 and the fairness of the comparator dose — a second dataset
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Journal club: STEP 8 and the fairness of the comparator dose — a second dataset Everything below is what sits behind that. Posting a small dataset on STEP 8. It is…
OLIADSRFDO+18 22 656 13h
Follow-up: Journal club: the retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper
On the subject in the title: Journal club: the retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper Working notes rather than a conclusion. A follow-up question about retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper that I did not know to ask…
NDNRRRSIS+20 24 8.7k 16mo
[2026 update] Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session
Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Bringing a claim rather than a paper, because the claim is the thing circulating.…
NVAVRJVBV+5 9 4.2k 1d
Journal club: SURMOUNT-1, read without the press release
Journal club: SURMOUNT-1, read without the press release Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Posting a small dataset on SURMOUNT-1. It is mine, it is…
LKIRKSASP+139 157 66k 12mo
Journal club: STEP 4 and what a withdrawal design can prove
On the subject in the title: Journal club: STEP 4 and what a withdrawal design can prove Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021). Please read it before posting; the…
DJTVGHIO+61 65 2k 13mo

Related topics — sharing the tags estimand, randomised trial, number needed to treat

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Coming back to: The SOUL trial and oral semaglutide cardiovascular outcomes
The SOUL trial and oral semaglutide cardiovascular outcomes — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. SOUL trial and oral semaglutide — I have the observation and I do not trust my…
TWBTAMDRM+100 104 4.2k 5mo
What I would record differently if I started again — the long version
What I would record differently if I started again — the long version I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Asking about the phase almost nobody writes…
VMHMRLEVLO+22 26 57k 5mo
[2026 update] Comparing tirzepatide and semaglutide is harder than the tables suggest
Comparing tirzepatide and semaglutide is harder than the tables suggest Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Putting the numbers in the first post, because a…
BAIDO 2 23k 21mo
Follow-up: What is genuinely unknown about long-term amylin agonism
What is genuinely unknown about long-term amylin agonism I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Putting the numbers in the first post, because a question…
NKSADM 2 25k 11mo
Revisiting: What pooling buys you and what it destroys
On the subject in the title: Revisiting: What pooling buys you and what it destroys Working notes rather than a conclusion. Pooling buys — I have the observation and I do not trust my interpretation of it, so…
JWZAEFIGGF+97 107 4k 19h