Appeal deadlines are strict and are stated in the letter. Missing one is the most avoidable way to lose.
One of those cases where knowing the mechanism does not help the decision.
4 likes 2mo
Access · Insurance & coverage · continued
An appeal that succeeded, with the letter structure — the long version posts 31–60
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
Post #30 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
Offering a way to settle appeal rather than another opinion about it. Two measurements, taken the same way, a fortnight apart. If the difference is within the noise, the question was not answerable at this precision.
0 likes 2mo
d.eriksen, post #6: Keep every document with dates in one place. An appeal months later is assembled from whatever you kept. If that is already documented somewhere, ignore me and link it. Go to post
Formulary status: the list of covered medications and the tier (how much you pay) they are on. Checking the current formulary before going to a clinic appointment saves surprise at the pharmacy.
Worth separating two things that post #32 runs together.
I have three months of notes on appeal and the honest summary is that the trend is real and the week-to-week numbers are noise. I nearly drew the opposite conclusion from the first fortnight.
8 likes 2mo
a.kowalski, post #2: The arithmetic in the opening post is right; the assumption feeding it is the part to check. Reimbursement changes: a compound covered one year might not be the next. A formulary decision in January can change by April. Checking again before refilling saves frustration. Go to post
Reimbursement changes: a compound covered one year might not be the next. A formulary decision in January can change by April. Checking again before refilling saves frustration.
a.molnar, post #11: Reimbursement changes: a compound covered one year might not be the next. A formulary decision in January can change by April. Checking again before refilling saves frustration. Genuinely open to being wrong about this one. Go to post
Reframing appeal slightly, because I think the disagreement is about the question rather than the answer. If the question is "does it happen", yes. If it is "how often", nobody here knows.
Picking up post #38: that is the part I would want checked first.
The documentation on appeal is better than this thread and I say that as someone who has posted in the thread.
12 likes 2mo
Appeal looks different depending on whether you are reading the primary literature or the summaries of it, and the difference is not in our favour.
2 likes 2mo
f.pires, post #19: This follows post #16 rather than contradicting it. The most useful thing anyone has posted about appeal in this category was a table of what had been measured and by whom. That is what I would want again. Go to post
Answering the question post #41 raises rather than the one it answers.
Where I would push back on the appeal consensus is the confidence, not the direction. The direction looks right. The confidence is borrowed.
The arithmetic in post #41 is right; the assumption feeding it is the part to check.
Small methodological point on appeal: repeating a measurement is cheap and resolves most of what is being argued about here at no cost to anyone.
13 likes 2mo
Formulary status: the list of covered medications and the tier (how much you pay) they are on. Checking the current formulary before going to a clinic appointment saves surprise at the pharmacy.
4 likes 2mo
f.abrahamsen, post #39: Picking up post #38: that is the part I would want checked first. The documentation on appeal is better than this thread and I say that as someone who has posted in the thread. Go to post
Building on post #45 rather than restating it.
Careful with the language on appeal. "Not detected" and "not present" are different findings and the first is a statement about the method.
Coming back to post #45, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
An update on my earlier appeal post: the pattern held for another six weeks and then stopped, which I did not predict and cannot explain.
8 likes 2mo
d.eriksen, post #35: The bit of appeal that nobody enjoys is that the answer changes depending on what you are trying to decide with it. Say what the decision is and the thread will converge. Go to post
Reimbursement changes: a compound covered one year might not be the next. A formulary decision in January can change by April. Checking again before refilling saves frustration.
I have said this before in a thread nobody could find, so it is worth repeating.
a.villalobos, post #13: The arithmetic in post #12 is right; the assumption feeding it is the part to check. Reimbursement changes: a compound covered one year might not be the next. A formulary decision in January can change by April. Checking again before refilling saves frustration. Go to post
Formulary status: the list of covered medications and the tier (how much you pay) they are on. Checking the current formulary before going to a clinic appointment saves surprise at the pharmacy.
Agreed, and I will stop repeating the version of this I had been repeating.
0 likes 2mo
The reason appeal is hard to answer is that the obvious measurement and the relevant quantity are not the same thing, and substituting one for the other is silent.
14 likes 2mo
Where I part company with post #59, and it is a narrow parting.
Reimbursement changes: a compound covered one year might not be the next. A formulary decision in January can change by April. Checking again before refilling saves frustration.
That is the version I would defend. It is not the version I started with.
28 likes 2mo