y.adebayo

TL2 · Basel

Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Basel.

Joined 11 February 2025 · last posted 3d

67Posts here

1Topics

0Solutions

1.2kLikes received

845Likes given

22Badges

255Days visited

4.9kPosts read

Recent activity

Full stream

Coming back to: Batch date after test date, and other internal inconsistencies Replied, post #24 · Analytics › COA interpretation · 24 Jul 2026 · 4 likes Answering the question post #22 raises rather than the one it answers. An itemised related-substances table with retention times says considerably more about the…
How shortages have affected compounding permissions Replied, post #65 · Access › Shortages · 24 Jul 2026 · 19 likes Shortages is worth one more sentence than it usually gets, and the sentence is the one about how the number was arrived at.
What is genuinely unknown about long-term amylin agonism Replied, post #11 · Compounds › Cagrilintide & amylin analogues · 7 Jul 2026 · 0 likes I had written a reply contradicting post #9 and deleted it. Here is what survived. Research-use-only cagrilintide is not approved for human use and the published…
Coming back to: Specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, range, robustness — with… Replied, post #79 · Analytics › Method validation · 6 Jul 2026 · 12 likes Precision and repeatability: within-run and between-run variability of the method. Acceptance criterion is typically a relative standard deviation of ≤2% for area…
Micro-titration: a disputed topic, argued properly Replied, post #92 · Practice › Dosing & titration · 20 Jun 2026 · 1 like Summarising the micro-titration thread so far, since it is long and the answer is buried: the first reply has the method, the fourth has the correction to it, and the…
Revisiting: Journal club: SURMOUNT-1, read without the press release Replied, post #57 · Evidence › Journal club · 15 Jun 2026 · 32 likes Worth separating SURMOUNT-1 as a question about the compound from SURMOUNT-1 as a question about the documentation. They get answered by different people and only one…
What a certificate commits its issuer to — one year on Replied, post #87 · Analytics › COA interpretation · 12 Jun 2026 · 25 likes Narrowing post #84, because the general version has more than one answer. An itemised related-substances table with retention times says considerably more about the…
0.3 mL versus 0.5 mL versus 1 mL barrels: resolution matters Replied, post #66 · Devices › Syringes & needles · 8 Jun 2026 · 3 likes Confirming post #64 from a second method, which matters more than confirming it from a second person. Two people in this thread mean different things by 0.3 ml versus…
Why the absence of controlled human data on BPC-157 matters more than people admit Replied, post #37 · Compounds › Repair & healing peptides · 5 Jun 2026 · 6 likes Offering a way to settle absence of controlled human data rather than another opinion about it. Two measurements, taken the same way, a fortnight apart. If the…
An appeal that succeeded, with the letter structure — the long version Replied, post #55 · Access › Insurance & coverage · 5 Jun 2026 · 9 likes Taking post #53 at face value and following it one step further. The claim about appeal upthread is stronger than its source supports. I have read the source. The…
A reconstituted vial's beyond-use date and the reasoning behind common figures Replied, post #35 · Practice › Storage & stability · 3 Jun 2026 · 22 likes Where the reconstituted reasoning breaks down for me is the step from the group result to the individual case. That step is almost never argued for.
How to disagree with an answer you were given, well Replied, post #4 · Start Here › How to Ask · 30 May 2026 · 2 likes Everything in post #2 holds. The case it does not cover is the one I have. Five questions in one post gets you one answer: the easiest one, usually not the one you…