A note on how Lateral-flow and colorimetric approaches gets discussed rather than on Lateral-flow and colorimetric approaches itself: the confident posts get the replies and the careful ones get ignored, and the careful ones have been right more often.
Coming back to: Lateral-flow and colorimetric approaches: the specificity problem
Post #5 is the version of this I will quote in future. One addition.
The arithmetic on Lateral-flow and colorimetric approaches is the easy part and it is where the errors are, which is an uncomfortable combination. Show your working and someone will catch it.
Building on post #28 rather than restating it.
An update on my earlier Lateral-flow and colorimetric approaches post: the pattern held for another six weeks and then stopped, which I did not predict and cannot explain.
Adding the boring version of Lateral-flow and colorimetric approaches, because the interesting version keeps getting posted and the boring one is usually right.
Check the ordinary explanations, in order, and stop when one of them accounts for what you are seeing. Most of the time the second one does.
Answering the question post #48 raises rather than the one it answers.
Lateral-flow devices: like a rapid COVID test. They have a reagent strip and produce a colour result. They are quick but not precise and not intended for quantitative work.
Not disagreeing with anyone above, just adding the bit I keep having to look up.
The right question for any home test is: what physical quantity does it measure, and what would have to be true for that quantity to answer your question? Most disappointment comes from skipping it.
Written in the hope of being told what I have missed.
The tare problem is the catch with weighing: vial-to-vial glass mass varies, so the useful measurement is the spread across a consignment rather than an absolute figure.
The mechanism is plausible, which is not the same as established.
Colorimetric tests: colour intensity correlates with concentration, but the relationship is non-linear at extremes and the correlation depends on the exact conditions (pH, temperature, timing). Reading the colour visually introduces subjectivity.
Written quickly, so the reasoning may be tighter than the wording.
Read the full topic (90 posts)
This topic was referenced in
- Cost versus information: making the trade-off explicitlyAnalytics › Home & field testing · 6 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
What I would want from a home test that does not exist yet — what changed since
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: What I would want from a home test that does not exist yet — what changed since Two reports on the same lot, and I would like help deciding whether…
|
+101 | 111 | 1.9k | 21h |
|
Why quantitation is the hard part, not detection
Why quantitation is the hard part, not detection I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Collecting what is known about quantitation in one place, because it…
|
+11 | 15 | 27k | 12mo |
|
Second pass at: Cost versus information: making the trade-off explicitly
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Second pass at: Cost versus information: making the trade-off explicitly Everything below is what sits behind that. Posting a small dataset on Cost versus…
|
+23 | 27 | 6.1k | 22h |
|
Reading a home test result without over-claiming — what changed since
On the subject in the title: Reading a home test result without over-claiming — what changed since Working notes rather than a conclusion. What changes if the standard account of Reading a home test result is…
|
2 | 12k | 6mo | |
|
What consumer-accessible tests can and cannot determine — a second dataset
What consumer-accessible tests can and cannot determine — a second dataset I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Posting a small dataset on…
|
+117 | 131 | 45k | 10h |
Related topics — sharing the tags third-party testing, LOD & LOQ, documentation quality
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, range, robustness — with real criteria — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: Specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, range, robustness — with real criteria — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting a small dataset on…
|
+53 | 58 | 7.5k | 6mo |
|
Repeatability versus intermediate precision
Repeatability versus intermediate precision — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Trying to establish the boundary conditions on repeatability versus intermediate precision.…
|
+119 | 134 | 34k | 13mo |
|
What a stability-indicating method is and how you demonstrate one
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: What a stability-indicating method is and how you demonstrate one Posting a small dataset on stability-indicating method. It is mine, it is…
|
4 | 57k | 6mo | |
|
A supplier that answers analytical questions with restated claims
On the subject in the title: A supplier that answers analytical questions with restated claims Working notes rather than a conclusion. Reading back through what has been written here about supplier, three…
|
+107 | 118 | 45k | 12mo |
|
Documentation that appears only after payment
Documentation that appears only after payment Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Proposing that documentation deserves a maintained page rather than a recurring…
|
+113 | 124 | 13k | 7mo |