No disagreement from me. Posting only so the question does not look ignored.
Constipation management, with a dietitian's contribution posts 61–89
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1 · go to the accepted answer.
My experience of constipation management contradicts the reply above. I am posting it as a data point rather than as a refutation, because one person's experience is exactly that.
This follows post #62 rather than contradicting it.
The published rates come from populations that were titrated on a defined schedule with clinical supervision. Rates from a forum are not comparable and are biased by who chooses to post.
The uncertainty is in the assumption, not in the calculation.
Worth separating two things that post #62 runs together.
Reading back through the constipation management threads from last year, the same three questions come up every time and only one of them has ever been answered properly. That seems like a documentation gap rather than a knowledge gap.
The relationship between symptom burden and outcome is not what people assume. Feeling worse is not evidence of a larger effect and feeling nothing is not evidence of an inactive preparation.
The short version is the first sentence; the rest is why.
Constipation: common, manageable, and frequently under-reported because it is not dramatic. Increasing fibre and fluid intake helps. Over-the-counter management is usually effective. This is worth addressing proactively rather than waiting for it to worsen.
I would want to see it done twice before believing it once.
Post #64 and I disagree about the size of the effect, not about the direction.
The published rates come from populations that were titrated on a defined schedule with clinical supervision. Rates from a forum are not comparable and are biased by who chooses to post.
I am describing what is, rather than arguing for what should be.
Post #66 is the version of this I will quote in future. One addition.
Where I have landed on constipation management, having got it wrong once in public: the direction is clear, the magnitude is not, and anyone quoting a precise magnitude has borrowed it from somewhere that did not measure it.
Good question, well framed, and I would like to see it answered properly.
Distinguishing three things in the constipation management discussion that keep getting used interchangeably: the observation, the proposed mechanism, and the recommendation that gets attached to both.
Post #71 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
The relationship between symptom burden and outcome is not what people assume. Feeling worse is not evidence of a larger effect and feeling nothing is not evidence of an inactive preparation.
If anyone can point at the primary source I would be grateful.
Everything in post #71 holds. The case it does not cover is the one I have.
The published rates come from populations that were titrated on a defined schedule with clinical supervision. Rates from a forum are not comparable and are biased by who chooses to post.
That is all the detail I have. Someone else will have more.
Narrowing post #75, because the general version has more than one answer.
Constipation is reported at least as often as nausea and is discussed a fraction as much. Fluid, fibre and movement are the boring answers and they are the ones that work.
The published rates come from populations that were titrated on a defined schedule with clinical supervision. Rates from a forum are not comparable and are biased by who chooses to post.
Adding thanks rather than a view. I do not have a view worth the space.
I had written a reply contradicting post #75 and deleted it. Here is what survived.
Constipation is reported at least as often as nausea and is discussed a fraction as much. Fluid, fibre and movement are the boring answers and they are the ones that work.
Collapsed as off-topic by two members at trust level 3 or above
The relationship between symptom burden and outcome is not what people assume. Feeling worse is not evidence of a larger effect and feeling nothing is not evidence of an inactive preparation.
That is my reading. Someone else read the same page differently and was reasonable.
What I would want before treating constipation management as settled: the method, the sample, and whether anyone tried to find the opposite result. Two of the three are usually missing.
I read post #79 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
The reason constipation management keeps being re-asked is that the answer is conditional and people quote it without the condition. It is not that the answer is unknown.
The published rates come from populations that were titrated on a defined schedule with clinical supervision. Rates from a forum are not comparable and are biased by who chooses to post.
Narrowing post #84, because the general version has more than one answer.
Constipation: common, manageable, and frequently under-reported because it is not dramatic. Increasing fibre and fluid intake helps. Over-the-counter management is usually effective. This is worth addressing proactively rather than waiting for it to worsen.
I have deliberately not rounded that, because the rounding is where the argument starts.
Everything in post #82 holds. The case it does not cover is the one I have.
The published rates come from populations that were titrated on a defined schedule with clinical supervision. Rates from a forum are not comparable and are biased by who chooses to post.
That is the version I would defend. It is not the version I started with.
Collapsed as off-topic by two members at trust level 3 or above
Marking my uncertainty on constipation management explicitly. I am confident about the direction, much less confident about the size, and not confident at all that it generalises past the case in the first post.
The arithmetic in post #87 is right; the assumption feeding it is the part to check.
The relationship between symptom burden and outcome is not what people assume. Feeling worse is not evidence of a larger effect and feeling nothing is not evidence of an inactive preparation.
The rule of thumb is fine; the edge cases are where it earns its keep.
This topic was referenced in
- [2026 update] Distinguishing expected GI effects from something that needs urgent attentionPractice › Side effects · 14 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Taste changes and food aversion, reported and discussed
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Taste changes and food aversion, reported and discussed Everything below is what sits behind that. The question about taste changes and food aversion that I…
|
+40 | 47 | 28k | 20mo |
|
Distinguishing expected GI effects from something that needs urgent attention
Distinguishing expected GI effects from something that needs urgent attention Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Reporting something rather than asking about…
|
+88 | 101 | 32k | 6mo |
|
Fatigue in the first month: how much is the drug and how much is intake
On the subject in the title: Fatigue in the first month: how much is the drug and how much is intake Working notes rather than a conclusion. Something changed and I would like to know whether it should have.…
|
4 | 17k | 3mo | |
|
Fatigue in the first month: how much is the drug and how much is intake — what changed since
Fatigue in the first month: how much is the drug and how much is intake — what changed since Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Something changed and I would…
|
+77 | 82 | 1.2k | 11mo |
|
Hair shedding at month three: mechanism and time course
On the subject in the title: Hair shedding at month three: mechanism and time course Working notes rather than a conclusion. Reading back through what has been written here about hair shedding, three…
|
2 | 47k | 7mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags constipation, nausea, delayed gastric emptying
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
A side-effect grading scheme this community uses, and its limits — the long version
A side-effect grading scheme this community uses, and its limits — the long version — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A narrow question about side-effect grading scheme,…
|
+19 | 23 | 29k | 20mo |
|
A side-effect grading scheme this community uses, and its limits
Posting this under the heading it deserves: A side-effect grading scheme this community uses, and its limits Everything below is what sits behind that. Side-effect grading scheme keeps being re-asked here and…
|
+1 | 5 | 3.8k | 12mo |
|
Fibre intake when total intake falls, and the constipation link — one year on
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Fibre intake when total intake falls, and the constipation link — one year on Everything below is what sits behind that. An honest uncertainty about Fibre intake…
|
+9 | 13 | 16k | 16h |
|
Meeting a protein target on a suppressed appetite
Meeting a protein target on a suppressed appetite Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have spent a fortnight trying to pin meeting a protein target down and I…
|
+39 | 44 | 11k | 7mo |
|
Shakes versus food: a pragmatic assessment — the long version
On the subject in the title: Shakes versus food: a pragmatic assessment — the long version Working notes rather than a conclusion. A narrow question about Shakes versus food, deliberately narrow, because the…
|
+36 | 41 | 28k | 14mo |