Follow-up: Trifluoroacetate content and its consequences
The opening post and I disagree about the size of the effect, not about the direction.
Trifluoroacetate is a counter-ion rather than an impurity, and it appears in the mass balance rather than in the chromatogram. Conflating the two accounts for several confused threads here.
The short answer was in the first line; everything after is the working.
Racemisation produces a diastereomer that is mass-identical and chromatographically resolvable only on a method chosen for the purpose. Standard reversed-phase frequently will not separate it.
I am describing what is, rather than arguing for what should be.
Acetate content: counter-ion content. Trifluoroacetate or acetate from the salt form of the peptide. Affects mass calculations and should be stated on a complete certificate.
None of the above is medical advice and I am not qualified to give any.
The related-substances total is only as informative as the method that generated it. Two per cent by a method that resolves everything is a different statement from two per cent by a method that resolves little.
That is the shape of it. The detail is where I would expect to be corrected.
Read the full topic (17 posts)
This topic was referenced in
- Second pass at: Where impurities in solid-phase peptide synthesis come fromAnalytics › Impurities & related substances · 51 replies
- Deamidation and the close-eluting pair it produces — the long versionAnalytics › Impurities & related substances · 3 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient? A narrow question about attributing a new peak, deliberately narrow, because the broad…
|
2 | 15k | 18mo | |
|
Named, unnamed and unspecified impurities as regulatory categories
On the subject in the title: Named, unnamed and unspecified impurities as regulatory categories Working notes rather than a conclusion. Two reports on the same lot, and I would like help deciding whether they…
|
+10 | 14 | 504 | 3mo |
|
[2026 update] A rising related-substance total over six months: degradation or method drift?
The question in the title: A rising related-substance total over six months: degradation or method drift? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Posting the method first, because…
|
+71 | 78 | 34k | 5mo |
|
Deamidation and the close-eluting pair it produces — the long version
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Deamidation and the close-eluting pair it produces — the long version Everything below is what sits behind that. A narrow question about Deamidation, deliberately…
|
3 | 347 | 24d | |
|
Aggregates and why a purity assay may miss them entirely
Aggregates and why a purity assay may miss them entirely Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I would like to disagree carefully with the settled view on…
|
+61 | 69 | 2.9k | 6mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags counter-ion content, endotoxin testing, HPLC
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Impurity thresholds: where the common numbers come from
Impurity thresholds: where the common numbers come from — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have spent a fortnight trying to pin impurity thresholds down and I want to set…
|
+11 | 15 | 825 | 2d |
|
Area percent versus weight percent: the confusion that causes most arguments — what changed since
Area percent versus weight percent: the confusion that causes most arguments — what changed since Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. What changes if the…
|
+30 | 34 | 40k | 13mo |
|
[2026 update] Reading a chromatogram someone posted without axes
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Reading a chromatogram someone posted without axes Everything below is what sits behind that. Reading a chromatogram, from the point of view of someone who has read…
|
2 | 59 | 2mo | |
|
Pre-registering a personal experiment, seriously
Pre-registering a personal experiment, seriously — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A narrow question about pre-registering a personal experiment, deliberately narrow,…
|
+96 | 119 | 58k | 14mo |
|
Mass error in ppm: the arithmetic and the caveat
Mass error in ppm: the arithmetic and the caveat Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked.…
|
+108 | 125 | 1.5k | 5mo |