The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Analytics · HPLC & UHPLC

[2026 update] Reading a chromatogram someone posted without axes

BO
b.oseiTL217 May 2026#1

Posting this under the heading it deserves: Reading a chromatogram someone posted without axes Everything below is what sits behind that.

Reading a chromatogram, from the point of view of someone who has read the documentation and is still stuck.

Saying which parts I have understood so that nobody wastes time re-explaining them, and where exactly the understanding stops.

25 likes 2mo
EC
e.coelhoTL230 May 2026#2

The opening post put the caveat in the right place and I want to underline it.

This is why a purity figure without the underlying chromatogram is weaker evidence than it appears. It is also why two competent laboratories can report different numbers on the same vial without either being wrong.

Old habit: I write down the expected answer before I calculate it.

27 likes 2mo
FA
f.abrahamsenTL2Member9 Jun 2026#3
e.coelho, post #2: The opening post put the caveat in the right place and I want to underline it. This is why a purity figure without the underlying chromatogram is weaker evidence than it appears. It is also why two competent laboratories can report different numbers on the same vial without either being wrong. Old habit: I write down the expected answer… Go to post

Narrowing the opening post, because the general version has more than one answer.

On integration: where the baseline is drawn matters more than most people realise. On a clean chromatogram with well-resolved peaks the choice is inconsequential. On a chromatogram with a trailing shoulder or a rising baseline it matters. Differences of one to two percentage points between defensible integrations are ordinary.

The short version is the first sentence; the rest is why.

0 likes in reply to #2 2mo

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Carryover and the ghost peak from last week's standard
On the subject in the title: Carryover and the ghost peak from last week's standard Working notes rather than a conclusion. What changes if the standard account of carryover is wrong? I ask because I have…
PBFDJMKOHD+80 92 16k 16mo
Revisiting: Why I ask for the gradient before I discuss the number
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: Why I ask for the gradient before I discuss the number Everything below is what sits behind that. I would like to understand what this number means…
DNIDGHECFA+15 19 43k 10mo
Coming back to: Column chemistry choices for a 40-residue peptide
On the subject in the title: Column chemistry choices for a 40-residue peptide Working notes rather than a conclusion. Column chemistry choices — I have the observation and I do not trust my interpretation of…
MLFPHB 2 43k 16mo
Resolution and tailing factor: real acceptance criteria
Resolution and tailing factor: real acceptance criteria Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Asking about resolution and tailing factor on behalf of the question…
NLPNV 2 15k 1mo
Follow-up: Comparing two chromatograms from different laboratories, properly
Comparing two chromatograms from different laboratories, properly — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
MMSSNCEFGA+62 67 12k 9h

Related topics — sharing the tags peak integration, HPLC, UV & DAD detection

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Ultrasound and skinfolds: operator dependence in practice — what changed since
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Ultrasound and skinfolds: operator dependence in practice — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. What changes if the standard account of…
BJAVTKPNRV+32 37 7.4k 3mo
Circumference measurements as a poor man's composition estimate
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Circumference measurements as a poor man's composition estimate Everything below is what sits behind that. Working notes on circumference measurements rather than a…
TCCNDVVB+96 112 14k 23mo
Area percent versus weight percent: the confusion that causes most arguments
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Area percent versus weight percent: the confusion that causes most arguments Everything below is what sits behind that. Proposing that area percent versus weight…
ADSVCDFNAD+10 14 2.1k 2mo
Carryover and the ghost peak from last week's standard — what changed since
Carryover and the ghost peak from last week's standard — what changed since Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. What changes if the standard account of Carryover…
FDLTZYFWAA+98 114 37k 22d
[2026 update] Waist circumference technique and its repeatability
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Waist circumference technique and its repeatability Everything below is what sits behind that. An honest uncertainty about Waist circumference technique rather than…
RZZACNSKG+23 27 5.9k 21h