The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Evidence · Journal club · continued

Journal club: FLOW and the renal composite, component by component posts 91–92

This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.

PF
p.fontaineTL218 Jul 2024#91

The most common failure mode is spending fifty minutes on the effect size and ten on the population. Reversing that ratio would improve most sessions.

0 likes 2y
B
BirkelandTL3Regular18 Jul 2024#92
h.eriksen, post #4: Sessions on negative or null results are consistently the most instructive and the hardest to get anyone to attend. I would rather say I do not know than round it up to an answer. Go to post

The figures usually contain the finding and the text usually contains the interpretation. Separating them for the first twenty minutes is a discipline worth keeping.

0 likes in reply to #4 2y

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Journal club: indirect comparison between two programmes, defended and attacked — one year on
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Journal club: indirect comparison between two programmes, defended and attacked — one year on Everything below is what sits behind that. Asking about indirect…
BZNEMETLM+45 50 3k 9mo
[2026 update] Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session
Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Bringing a claim rather than a paper, because the claim is the thing circulating.…
NVAVRJVBV+5 9 4.2k 1d
Journal club: is percentage weight change the right endpoint?
Journal club: is percentage weight change the right endpoint? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Bringing a claim rather than a paper, because the claim…
IFLEDSSBE+116 120 23k 3mo
Journal club: STEP 1 and the treatment-policy estimand — does this still hold?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Journal club: STEP 1 and the treatment-policy estimand — does this still hold? Working notes on STEP 1 rather than a conclusion. I would rather…
GKRCDALB+70 76 4.8k 15h
Journal club: SELECT, absolute risk, and how it was reported — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: Journal club: SELECT, absolute risk, and how it was reported — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting a small dataset on SELECT. It is mine, it is…
VKJBFNAITH 4 1.3k 1mo

Related topics — sharing the tags randomised trial, estimand, risk of bias

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Open-label extensions: what survives and what does not
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Open-label extensions: what survives and what does not Everything below is what sits behind that. I have spent a fortnight trying to pin open-label extensions down…
PQZILUCMB 4 22k 3mo
Interim analyses and stopping rules — does this still hold?
Interim analyses and stopping rules — does this still hold? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Interim analyses and stopping rules, from the point of view…
JDMHKMFTHL+30 34 29k 13mo
Coming back to: Prediction intervals and why they are more honest than confidence intervals
Prediction intervals and why they are more honest than confidence intervals Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Prediction intervals — I have the observation and…
TDIBB 2 65 22mo
Semaglutide half-life: where the 165 to 184 hour figure comes from
Semaglutide half-life: where the 165 to 184 hour figure comes from — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Putting the numbers in the first post, because a question about a…
KBDBVBNTIG+128 145 3k 4mo
Conference abstracts as evidence: the weakest common citation
On the subject in the title: Conference abstracts as evidence: the weakest common citation Working notes rather than a conclusion. Reading an unrefereed manuscript properly, and asking whether I am doing it…
NSHMTLJDBB+1 5 2k 9mo