Where I would push back on the reading an interaction checker output consensus is the confidence, not the direction. The direction looks right. The confidence is borrowed.
Reading an interaction checker output critically
Absence of an interaction study is not evidence of no interaction. A great many combinations discussed here have simply never been studied, and saying so is more useful than reasoning from mechanism alone.
The disagreement above is smaller than it looks once the terms are fixed.
Narrowing post #46, because the general version has more than one answer.
The version of reading an interaction checker output that circulates here is a simplification of a simplification. It is not wrong, but it has lost the conditions under which it holds, and those conditions are where the interesting cases live.
Narrowing post #77, because the general version has more than one answer.
Vitamins: most vitamins have no significant interaction. Fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, K) might be affected by the slowing of fat absorption during weight loss, but that is a nutritional consequence rather than an interaction.
Adding the measurement that post #99 says would settle it.
The most useful reply I ever got about reading an interaction checker output was a request to state my units. It sounds like pedantry and it has saved me twice.
Anticoagulants: no direct interaction with the compounds in this class. Weight loss and body composition changes might affect the clearance or effect of warfarin if you are on it; monitoring INR more frequently during weight loss is reasonable.
That is all the detail I have. Someone else will have more.
Separation timing versus clinically important interaction: a separation timing inconvenience (taking one medication 2 hours before or after another) is not the same as a clinically important interaction. Both can reduce absorption of one or the other, but only true interactions require active management.
Take it as a starting point and not as a specification.
Read the full topic (153 posts)
This topic was referenced in
- Common supplements people ask about, assessed one at a timePractice › Interactions · 107 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Insulin combinations and hypoglycaemia risk
On the subject in the title: Insulin combinations and hypoglycaemia risk Working notes rather than a conclusion. I was wrong about insulin combinations and hypoglycaemia risk in a thread last spring and I…
|
+18 | 22 | 7.8k | 13mo |
|
Metformin co-administration and additive GI effects
Metformin co-administration and additive GI effects Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Trying to work out what would count as evidence on metformin…
|
+28 | 32 | 2.1k | 15mo |
|
Anaesthesia and elective surgery: the aspiration question
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Anaesthesia and elective surgery: the aspiration question Everything below is what sits behind that. A narrow question about anaesthesia and elective surgery,…
|
+103 | 115 | 6.6k | 3mo |
|
Anaesthesia and elective surgery: the aspiration question — does this still hold?
Anaesthesia and elective surgery: the aspiration question — does this still hold? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Asking about Anaesthesia and…
|
+23 | 27 | 5.6k | 17mo |
|
Common supplements people ask about, assessed one at a time — a second dataset
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Common supplements people ask about, assessed one at a time — a second dataset Everything below is what sits behind that. A follow-up question about Common…
|
+97 | 104 | 15k | 3mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags metformin, delayed gastric emptying, needs a source
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
When "no data" is the complete and final answer
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: When "no data" is the complete and final answer Asking about the compound itself rather than about a trial of it. I have read the maintained page…
|
+154 | 165 | 6.3k | 15mo |
|
Second pass at: Metformin co-administration and additive GI effects
On the subject in the title: Second pass at: Metformin co-administration and additive GI effects Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting a small dataset on Metformin co-administration. It is mine, it…
|
+131 | 142 | 56k | 19d |
|
Why the absence of controlled human data on BPC-157 matters more than people admit
Why the absence of controlled human data on BPC-157 matters more than people admit — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. I would like to know what people…
|
+60 | 66 | 16k | 1d |
|
BPC-157: what the rodent literature actually shows, and what it does not — does this still hold?
The question in the title: BPC-157: what the rodent literature actually shows, and what it does not — does this still hold? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. I would like to…
|
+6 | 10 | 3.1k | 1d |
|
BPC-157: what the rodent literature actually shows, and what it does not
BPC-157: what the rodent literature actually shows, and what it does not — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to know what people here actually do about BPC-157,…
|
+44 | 48 | 3k | 10mo |