The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Analytics · Mass spectrometry

Reading an MS report that only gives you a single number — the long version

TT
taper_tableTL3Regular21 Dec 2024#1

Reading an MS report that only gives you a single number — the long version — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable.

I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it anywhere.

A PeptideMeter report on a semaglutide lot gives 99.1% purity. The supplier certificate for the same lot states 97.7%. Both documents name a reversed-phase method; neither states the same gradient.

My question is not "who is right". It is: given that those two figures were produced by different methods, what is the largest difference I should expect from method alone, and at what point does a gap stop being explainable that way?

25 likes 19mo
R
RidgewayTL3Regular12 Jan 2025 · edited#2

The opening post answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.

Electrospray ionisation produces multiply charged ions. For a 4 kDa peptide you expect mostly 2+, 3+, and 4+ charge states. Reading an electrospray spectrum means recognizing the envelope, not looking for one peak.

4 likes 18mo
AK
an.kirchnerTL228 Jan 2025#3
taper_table, post #1: Reading an MS report that only gives you a single number — the long version — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it anywhere. A PeptideMeter report on a semaglutide lot gives 99.1% purity. The supplier certificate for the same lot states… Go to post

Calibration matters: a high-resolution instrument out of calibration can report mass with ppm error large enough to be uninformative. Check when the instrument was last calibrated before trusting the reported accuracy.

On balance I think that is right, and I would not bet much on it.

0 likes in reply to #1 18mo
Moved from HPLC & UHPLC by owen.brady. Category placement is not obvious from outside and getting it wrong is expected. This topic will get better answers here. The move is recorded in the public log citing R7.

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Adducts: sodium, potassium, and the peak you did not expect — does this still hold?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Adducts: sodium, potassium, and the peak you did not expect — does this still hold? Adducts keeps being re-asked here and I think that is because…
KBZYLVCETV+113 119 1.7k 3mo
Isotope patterns and why the monoisotopic peak is not the tallest — does this still hold?
Isotope patterns and why the monoisotopic peak is not the tallest — does this still hold? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Asking about Isotope patterns…
PODBTD 2 4.6k 7h
MALDI versus ESI for a quick identity check
On the subject in the title: MALDI versus ESI for a quick identity check Working notes rather than a conclusion. I was wrong about MALDI versus ESI in a thread last spring and I would like to correct it…
RMTVO 2 2k 11mo
Mass error in ppm: the arithmetic and the caveat — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: Mass error in ppm: the arithmetic and the caveat — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked.…
HKGVDWONW+20 24 1.7k 1d
[2026 update] Why mass spectrometry cannot tell you about an epimer
Why mass spectrometry cannot tell you about an epimer — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it…
GTAPFP 2 1k 8mo

Related topics — sharing the tags mass error (ppm), counter-ion content, LC-MS

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Trifluoroacetate content and its consequences
Trifluoroacetate content and its consequences — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. What changes if the standard account of trifluoroacetate content is wrong? I ask because I…
AIRDRVHFAV+123 134 31k 5mo
Coming back to: Adsorption to container surfaces and to plastics
Adsorption to container surfaces and to plastics — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Adsorption — I have the observation and I do not trust my interpretation of it, so I am…
FVGEL 2 459 17mo
Second pass at: Isotonicity and what happens when you get it wrong
Second pass at: Isotonicity and what happens when you get it wrong — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Something about Isotonicity does not reconcile and I would like a…
NSFNCATHRE+1 5 2.6k 11mo
Buffers, pH and why a formulation is a formulation
Buffers, pH and why a formulation is a formulation Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A formulation question rather than a pharmacological one, though the two…
BEVLGSODB+11 15 51k 21mo
Named, unnamed and unspecified impurities as regulatory categories — the long version
Named, unnamed and unspecified impurities as regulatory categories — the long version — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Two reports on the same lot, and I would like help…
PNTDHFEFJR+112 120 7.6k 5h