Receptor desensitisation as a tolerance hypothesis, and its weak evidence — the long version
GLP-1 receptor agonism produces its metabolic effects through more than one route: central satiety signalling, delayed gastric emptying, and glucose-dependent insulin secretion. Attributing everything to one of them is where most simplified accounts go wrong.
Take the reasoning and check the arithmetic; I do not always get it right.
Picking up post #13: that is the part I would want checked first.
In vitro potency and clinical potency are related by a long chain of assumptions. A compound more potent at the receptor is not necessarily more effective at a tolerable dose.
Happy to be corrected if someone holds better data than mine.
GIP receptor signalling: the glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide receptor (GIP) is involved in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. GIP agonism is thought to contribute to tirzepatide's effect but the mechanism is not fully settled.
It took me longer than it should have to see that.
Post #44 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
GLP-1 receptor signalling: the GLP-1 receptor is expressed on beta cells (insulin secretion), on neurons (appetite and gastric motility), and on myocardium (contractility). Different tissues respond to the same signal in different ways.
I read post #53 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Amylin signalling reaches satiety through a distinct receptor complex, which is the mechanistic basis for expecting an amylin analogue and an incretin agonist to add rather than overlap.
A single observation, in a thread that deserves better than single observations.
Read the full topic (64 posts)
This topic was referenced in
- Receptor desensitisation as a tolerance hypothesis, and its weak evidencePharmacology › Receptor biology · 57 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Receptor desensitisation as a tolerance hypothesis, and its weak evidence
Receptor desensitisation as a tolerance hypothesis, and its weak evidence — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Trying to work out what would count as evidence on receptor…
|
+52 | 57 | 25k | just now |
|
GLP-1 receptor distribution: central and peripheral — one year on
GLP-1 receptor distribution: central and peripheral — one year on — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. An honest uncertainty about GLP-1 receptor distribution rather than a…
|
+7 | 11 | 43k | 3mo |
|
Vagal afferents and the gut-brain pathway — one year on
Vagal afferents and the gut-brain pathway — one year on Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. An honest uncertainty about Vagal afferents rather than a disguised…
|
2 | 136 | 11mo | |
|
Biased agonism: a real phenomenon, an over-used explanation — what changed since
Biased agonism: a real phenomenon, an over-used explanation — what changed since — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. What changes if the standard account of Biased agonism is…
|
+49 | 56 | 47k | 17mo |
|
Amylin receptor signalling and satiety — what changed since
On the subject in the title: Amylin receptor signalling and satiety — what changed since Working notes rather than a conclusion. What changes if the standard account of Amylin receptor signalling and satiety…
|
+73 | 78 | 3.5k | 2mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags retatrutide, amylin analogues, semaglutide
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
How the published trials escalated, tabulated side by side
The question in the title: How the published trials escalated, tabulated side by side I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Something about published trials escalated does not…
|
+4 | 8 | 4.2k | 5mo |
|
Vagal afferents and the gut-brain pathway
On the subject in the title: Vagal afferents and the gut-brain pathway Working notes rather than a conclusion. Vagal afferents — I have the observation and I do not trust my interpretation of it, so I am…
|
+5 | 9 | 44k | 13mo |
|
Restarting after a long gap: what the labelling implies
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Restarting after a long gap: what the labelling implies Everything below is what sits behind that. I have read the maintained page on this and I still have a gap,…
|
+41 | 46 | 11k | 15h |
|
Comparing the STEP programme populations: who was actually enrolled
Comparing the STEP programme populations: who was actually enrolled Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Two things I would like separated before anyone answers…
|
2 | 7.5k | 2mo | |
|
Half-life, steady state, and accumulation worked through — a second dataset
Half-life, steady state, and accumulation worked through — a second dataset — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Working through the kinetics rather than the pharmacology,…
|
+110 | 126 | 14k | 4mo |