Research-use-only labelling: what it means and what it does not — the long version
Answering the question post #24 raises rather than the one it answers.
An indication approved for one age range does not extend to another, and paediatric extensions are separate decisions with separate evidence.
A qualification I should have led with rather than closed on.
An indication approved for one age range does not extend to another, and paediatric extensions are separate decisions with separate evidence.
Take it as a starting point and not as a specification.
That is clearer than the version I had in my head. Thank you.
On Research-use-only labelling I would separate what is worth knowing from what is worth acting on. The first list is long and the second is short, and conflating them is how threads get heated.
Where I part company with post #105, and it is a narrow parting.
An indication approved for one age range does not extend to another, and paediatric extensions are separate decisions with separate evidence.
That is the honest state of it as of this week.
I had written a reply contradicting post #114 and deleted it. Here is what survived.
Generic or biosimilar entry depends on patent and exclusivity positions that are jurisdiction-specific and are frequently misreported.
Take the reasoning and check the arithmetic; I do not always get it right.
Coming back to post #119, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Where I would push back on the Research-use-only labelling consensus is the confidence, not the direction. The direction looks right. The confidence is borrowed.
Read the full topic (159 posts)
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Enforcement priorities versus written rules — does this still hold?
Enforcement priorities versus written rules — does this still hold? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Asking what a regulator's document actually says,…
|
+36 | 40 | 37k | 11mo |
|
Second pass at: Import rules for personal quantities, by jurisdiction, dated
Second pass at: Import rules for personal quantities, by jurisdiction, dated Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Asking what a regulator's document actually…
|
2 | 5k | 11mo | |
|
Research-use-only labelling: what it means and what it does not
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Research-use-only labelling: what it means and what it does not Everything below is what sits behind that. A labelling question, and I would like the answer to be…
|
+100 | 110 | 37k | 5mo |
|
Prescription requirements and telehealth models — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: Prescription requirements and telehealth models — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting a small dataset on Prescription requirements and telehealth…
|
+87 | 94 | 1.1k | 21d |
|
Enforcement priorities versus written rules
Enforcement priorities versus written rules — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Asking what a regulator's document actually says, since the summaries of it disagree. I have…
|
2 | 62k | 15mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags EMA, research use only, compounding
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pen wastage and its effect on real cost — the long version
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Pen wastage and its effect on real cost — the long version Everything below is what sits behind that. A narrow question about Pen wastage, deliberately narrow,…
|
2 | 34k | 13mo | |
|
Second pass at: How to research a compound with no human data without deceiving yourself
Second pass at: How to research a compound with no human data without deceiving yourself Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. The question about research a…
|
+64 | 71 | 2.5k | 13mo |
|
EU-wide position versus national implementation
EU-wide position versus national implementation Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Eu-wide position versus national implementation: what I expected, what I…
|
+22 | 29 | 356 | 11mo |
|
Coming back to: Payment method and the leverage it gives you, ranked
Payment method and the leverage it gives you, ranked — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A payments question, with the mechanics separated from the money. What I would like…
|
+21 | 26 | 43k | 2d |
|
Second pass at: Hoarding and why it makes a shortage worse
Second pass at: Hoarding and why it makes a shortage worse Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in this…
|
+115 | 133 | 11k | 21mo |