The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Topic summary

Revisiting: Theoretical plates: useful number or ritual?

This is a generated summary. It shows the 5 most-liked posts from a topic of 22, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.
NR
n.rowntreeTL3Regular17 Apr 2026 · edited#3

Before anything else: what was the gradient, and at what wavelength? Area percent at different wavelengths is not the same number even on the same sample because different species absorb differently at different wavelengths. With the method stated, I can tell you something useful. Without it, all I can say is that there is one large peak.

32 likes 3mo
K
KAnderssonTL3Regular13 May 2026#7

This follows post #6 rather than contradicting it.

Injection volume matters because column overload distorts peak shape, and an overloaded main peak can swallow a small neighbour. A certificate without injection volume is missing something load-bearing.

The number is defensible. The precision I gave it is not.

24 likes 3mo
LC
l.chevalierTL3Regular Solution24 May 2026#9

Change the wavelength and the proportions change even though the sample has not. That is the reason the wavelength has to be on the document for the number to mean anything.

8 likes 2mo
C
chromatogramTL4Analytical chemist4 Jul 2026#17

Post #15 and I disagree about the size of the effect, not about the direction.

Reporting rather than recommending, on Theoretical plates. What happened is above. Whether it should have is a different question and not one I am qualified to answer.

30 likes 24d
LV
l.vukovicTL218 Jul 2026#20

Marking my place. If it changes for me I will come back and say so.

31 likes 10d

Read the full topic (22 posts)

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
What a reversed-phase purity number actually is
The question in the title: What a reversed-phase purity number actually is I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat…
NIBTDHFEF+87 101 27k 4h
[2026 update] Detection wavelength and why 214 nm and 280 nm disagree
Detection wavelength and why 214 nm and 280 nm disagree — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to disagree carefully with the settled view on Detection wavelength,…
HVKAMCDKR+69 76 920 6h
Why 99.2% and 97.8% on the same lot can both be correct
Why 99.2% and 97.8% on the same lot can both be correct I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. I would like to understand what this number means before I…
GHAAJSLCCR+16 20 3.1k 11h
System suitability injections: if they failed, the run did not happen
Posting this under the heading it deserves: System suitability injections: if they failed, the run did not happen Everything below is what sits behind that. Proposing that system suitability injections…
KKCELLTNK+23 27 6k 11mo
About the HPLC & UHPLC category
Reversed-phase separations, gradients, columns, integration, and reading a chromatogram properly. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded…
KBNKBNCPB 4 137 18h

Related topics — sharing the tags system suitability, UV & DAD detection, gradient method

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Repeatability versus intermediate precision — what changed since
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Repeatability versus intermediate precision — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. What changes if the standard account of Repeatability…
DOBRANTIFN 4 21k 5h
Seven-day rolling means and why weekly readings mislead
Seven-day rolling means and why weekly readings mislead Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Posting a series rather than a conclusion, with the method first.…
MDOZIMSAA+109 125 42k 10h
Blinding yourself: practical methods and their limits — the long version
Blinding yourself: practical methods and their limits — the long version Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A narrow question about Blinding yourself,…
CTSDNGJEMD+7 11 1.8k 22h
Coming back to: Specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, range, robustness — with real criteria
On the subject in the title: Specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, range, robustness — with real criteria Working notes rather than a conclusion. Trying to establish the boundary conditions on…
AWHNFJCOT+93 99 1.4k 6d
Cleaning a self-reported dataset and what you throw away — what changed since
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Cleaning a self-reported dataset and what you throw away — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. What changes if the standard account of…
HMSCPW 2 2k 1h