Sourcing · Payments

Second pass at: A payment that went through twice: how it was resolved

Sourcing › Payments research use only documentation quality payments

an.kirchnerTL216 Sep 2024#1

On the subject in the title: Second pass at: A payment that went through twice: how it was resolved Working notes rather than a conclusion.

A payments question, with the mechanics separated from the money.

What I would like to understand is what each payment route actually leaves you holding afterwards: what is recorded, who holds the record, and what can be produced later if a consignment has to be discussed. That is a different question from which route is cheapest.

I have listed what I keep at the moment below. I would like to know what is missing from it rather than whether it is enough.

2 likes 22mo

c.draganovTL1Member20 Feb 2025#2

Worth separating two things that the opening post runs together.

No payment facilitation: this site does not handle payments and does not connect buyers and sellers for the purpose of payment. We discuss logistics and documentation of the process but not the commerce itself.

The number is defensible. The precision I gave it is not.

6 likes 17mo

v.bruunTL212 Jun 2025#3

Nothing to add on the substance. Thank you for taking the question at face value.

16 likes 14mo

Suggested topics

Topic	Participants	Replies	Views	Activity
Payment mechanics and the recovery options that do not exist — what changed since Sourcing › Payments documentation quality payments research use only Solved On the subject in the title: Payment mechanics and the recovery options that do not exist — what changed since Working notes rather than a conclusion. A payments question, with the mechanics separated from…	+14	18	17k	13mo
Documenting a payment dispute without naming and shaming Sourcing › Payments documentation quality research use only payments Documenting a payment dispute without naming and shaming — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A payments question, with the mechanics separated from the money. What I would…	+5	9	9.8k	2mo
Documenting a payment dispute without naming and shaming — the long version Sourcing › Payments documentation quality payments research use only Posting this under the heading it deserves: Documenting a payment dispute without naming and shaming — the long version Everything below is what sits behind that. A narrow question about Documenting a payment…		2	32k	1mo
Payment method and the leverage it gives you, ranked Sourcing › Payments research use only payments documentation quality Solved Closed Posting this under the heading it deserves: Payment method and the leverage it gives you, ranked Everything below is what sits behind that. A payments question, with the mechanics separated from the money.…	+71	76	56k	10mo
Coming back to: Payment mechanics and the recovery options that do not exist Sourcing › Payments research use only payments documentation quality Under review On the subject in the title: Payment mechanics and the recovery options that do not exist Working notes rather than a conclusion. A payments question, with the mechanics separated from the money. What I would…	+7	11	2.6k	7mo

Related topics — sharing the tags research use only, documentation quality, payments

Topic	Participants	Replies	Views	Activity
A supplier who responds to a discrepancy with silence Sourcing › Red flags underdosing documentation quality moderation mislabelling Closed On the subject in the title: A supplier who responds to a discrepancy with silence Working notes rather than a conclusion. Two things I would like separated before anyone answers on supplier, because they get…		2	6.1k	16mo
Revisiting: Can a home kit substitute for a laboratory report? A careful no Analytics › Home & field testing ELISA LOD & LOQ documentation quality third-party testing Revisiting: Can a home kit substitute for a laboratory report? A careful no — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to disagree carefully with the settled view on…	+50	56	9.8k	1d
AOD-9604 and the fragment hypothesis, revisited Compounds › Other compounds mislabelling research use only custom synthesis needs a source Posting this under the heading it deserves: AOD-9604 and the fragment hypothesis, revisited Everything below is what sits behind that. Reading back through what has been written here about AOD-9604, three…	+40	44	2.8k	6mo
Naming conventions for research peptides and the confusion they cause — one year on Compounds › Other compounds research use only mislabelling needs a source Naming conventions for research peptides and the confusion they cause — one year on — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Asking about Naming conventions for research peptides…	+1	5	181	2y
Reading a regulatory notice rather than an article about it — what changed since Sourcing › Regulatory research use only MHRA FDA personal import Reading a regulatory notice rather than an article about it — what changed since — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Asking what a regulator's document actually says, since…	+28	32	640	13mo

Sponsored Janoshik Analytical — independent third-party testingHPLC purity and mass-spectrometric identity on submitted samples, reported with the method stated. The laboratory most often cited in this community’s verification records.Independent testing → Sponsored GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — synthesis, directFounded 1998. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, over 1,500 staff and 200-plus patents. Custom peptide synthesis and amino acid derivatives, with a batch certificate on every order.Custom synthesis →