The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Topic summary

Second pass at: Fasting versus non-fasting and which tests care

This is a generated summary. It shows the 5 most-liked posts from a topic of 26, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.
BI
blank_injectionTL2Analytical chemist16 Dec 2025#3
s.antonsen, post #2: The opening post put the caveat in the right place and I want to underline it. Time of day: some biomarkers vary across the day. Cortisol in the morning differs from cortisol in the evening. Comparing results from different times of day is comparing things that are not the same. Go to post

I would put moderate confidence on the mainstream reading of Fasting versus non-fasting and no more. That is not scepticism for its own sake; it is where the sourcing actually stops.

27 likes in reply to #2 7mo
ZC
z.cardosoTL25 Jan 2026#6
n.villalobos, post #4: That reframing is the whole thing. The facts I already had. Go to post

Post #5 and I disagree about the size of the effect, not about the direction.

A trend needs at least three points to be a trend. Two points are a line and a line through noise is still a line.

19 likes in reply to #4 7mo
F
FFaulknerTL3Regular28 Jan 2026#10
d.moreau, post #5: Adding the boring version of Fasting versus non-fasting, because the interesting version keeps getting posted and the boring one is usually right. Check the ordinary explanations, in order, and stop when one of them accounts for what you are seeing. Most of the time the second one does. Go to post

Fasting state, time of day, recent exercise and hydration all move several common analytes. Standardising the conditions matters more than the interval between draws.

It is worth stating the boring hypothesis before the interesting one.

26 likes in reply to #5 6mo
DS
d.szymanskiTL3Wiki editor13 Feb 2026#13

I had written a reply contradicting post #11 and deleted it. Here is what survived.

Repeat before acting is standard practice for an isolated abnormal result on most analytes, and it is standard for a reason.

Worth reading the earlier posts in this thread before acting on mine.

23 likes 5mo
GT
g.tanakaTL3Regular7 Apr 2026#24

I had read the opposite somewhere and cannot now find where, which tells me something.

30 likes 4mo

Read the full topic (26 posts)

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Which panel is worth repeating and which is worth ignoring — a second dataset
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Which panel is worth repeating and which is worth ignoring — a second dataset Posting a small dataset on panel. It is mine, it is uncontrolled, and…
VBPWCGDOTP+108 117 46k 4mo
HbA1c lag and what it can and cannot tell you at eight weeks
HbA1c lag and what it can and cannot tell you at eight weeks Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Something about hba1c lag does not reconcile and I would like a…
JMMPKRVNK+14 18 2.6k 14mo
Lipase elevation without symptoms: the interpretation problem
Lipase elevation without symptoms: the interpretation problem Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Lipase elevation without symptoms — I have the observation and…
ITNNMPMFN+21 25 62k 5mo
Lipid changes during rapid weight loss: the expected trajectory
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Lipid changes during rapid weight loss: the expected trajectory Everything below is what sits behind that. Lipid changes during rapid weight: what I expected, what…
RAKBANDBVK+11 15 34k 11h
Biological variation versus analytical imprecision
On the subject in the title: Biological variation versus analytical imprecision Working notes rather than a conclusion. A question about biological variation versus analytical imprecision that I think has a…
FFSSJA 2 42k 12mo

Related topics — sharing the tags lipase & amylase, liver enzymes, lipid panel

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
About the Bloodwork category
Panels, reference intervals, biological variation, and resisting the urge to over-read one result. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded…
DOKBFLCR+4 8 4.4k 3mo
Biological variation versus analytical imprecision
On the subject in the title: Biological variation versus analytical imprecision Working notes rather than a conclusion. A question about biological variation versus analytical imprecision that I think has a…
FFSSJA 2 42k 12mo
Micronutrient status when intake falls substantially — a second dataset
Micronutrient status when intake falls substantially — a second dataset Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Posting a small dataset on Micronutrient status. It…
MMNMYLMSL+9 13 274 14mo
HbA1c lag and what it can and cannot tell you at eight weeks
HbA1c lag and what it can and cannot tell you at eight weeks Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Something about hba1c lag does not reconcile and I would like a…
JMMPKRVNK+14 18 2.6k 14mo
Biological variation versus analytical imprecision — does this still hold?
The question in the title: Biological variation versus analytical imprecision — does this still hold? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. The question about Biological…
SJDSC 2 1.8k 8mo