f.lindholm
TL2 · Curitiba
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Curitiba.
Joined 26 January 2025 · last posted 2d
75Posts here
0Topics
1Solutions
888Likes received
992Likes given
21Badges
172Days visited
2.4kPosts read
Recent activity
Full stream-
Dizziness on standing: the ordinary explanation first — one year on Replied, post #17 · Nutrition & Training › Hydration & electrolytes · 26 Jul 2026 · 1 like The question underneath Dizziness on standing is usually "how would I tell?" rather than "what is true?", and that one has a method attached to it. Write down what you…
-
Athletes in weight-category sports: a different risk calculus Replied, post #41 · Clinical › Special populations · 25 Jul 2026 · 5 likes Worth separating two things that post #38 runs together. Having read the whole athletes in weight-category sports thread before replying: the question in the first post…
-
Journal club: indirect comparison between two programmes, defended and attacked Replied, post #125 · Evidence › Journal club · 21 Jul 2026 · 13 likes Critical appraisal template: (1) What did the trial set out to estimate? (2) Could the design answer that question? (3) Was the population sufficiently similar to your…
-
Coming back to: Specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, range, robustness — with… Replied, post #97 · Analytics › Method validation · 20 Jul 2026 · 6 likes Everything in post #96 holds. The case it does not cover is the one I have. Range and working range are different things and a certificate rarely distinguishes them.…
-
[2026 update] Interpreting a result that disagrees with the supplier's certificate Replied, post #87 · Sourcing › Independent verification · 13 Jul 2026 · 0 likes PeptideMeter: purity analysis plus structured, dated supplier verification records. Produces both individual analytical results and verification records assessed over…
-
Aggregate verification data across the directory, with caveats Replied, post #37 · Sourcing › Independent verification · 9 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Second-hand on aggregate verification data, so weight it accordingly — someone whose method I trust told me this and I have not verified it myself.
-
Comparing prices across jurisdictions without misleading yourself Replied, post #57 · Access › Pricing · 9 Jun 2026 · 18 likes Taking post #56 at face value and following it one step further. The bit of comparing prices across jurisdictions that nobody enjoys is that the answer changes…
-
Run-in periods and the population they select Replied, post #133 · Evidence › Trials · 9 Jun 2026 · 0 likes Risk of bias: structured appraisal of internal validity. Key things to assess: randomisation method (was it truly random or could someone predict the next assignment),…
-
A critique that turned out to be unfair, retracted by its author Replied, post #9 · Evidence › Study critique · 8 Jun 2026 · 7 likes Worth stating the null on critique before we explain it: the observation may be nothing. That possibility deserves a sentence and usually does not get one.
-
What I would want from a home test that does not exist yet — what changed since Replied, post #45 · Analytics › Home & field testing · 6 Jun 2026 · 6 likes Ultraviolet absorbance at 280 nanometres estimates concentration for peptides containing aromatic residues and gives nothing for peptides that do not. Knowing which…
-
Spreadsheets: an appreciation — what changed since Replied, post #61 · Lounge › Off topic · 4 Jun 2026 · 0 likes What I would tell a new member reading about Spreadsheets for the first time: the confident posts are not the reliable ones, and the reliable ones are longer.
-
Coming back to: How much context is too much context in a first post? Replied, post #4 · Start Here › How to Ask · 28 May 2026 · 3 likes Context that matters: compound, how long in, current dose, relevant history. Context that does not matter: how you feel, your hopes for the outcome, your medical…