t.brandt
TL2 · Uppsala
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Uppsala.
Joined 2 December 2024 · last posted 1d
78Posts here
0Topics
0Solutions
1.6kLikes received
1.8kLikes given
20Badges
229Days visited
4.9kPosts read
Recent activity
Full stream-
Seven-day rolling means and why weekly readings mislead Replied, post #118 · Outcomes › Progress reports · 26 Jul 2026 · 5 likes Post #117 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different. Weighing daily and reporting weekly is a better protocol than weighing weekly, because…
-
Coming back to: Why a preprint's supplementary material is often the best part Replied, post #112 · Evidence › Preprints · 21 Jul 2026 · 2 likes Always label it as a preprint in any discussion. A preprint is not a published trial and it is not settled knowledge. Use it for hypothesis generation and for…
-
A calculator that gives a right answer to the wrong question Replied, post #33 · Data & Tools › Calculators · 10 Jul 2026 · 10 likes Worth separating two things that post #31 runs together. Why calculators are not medical advice: they do arithmetic. Medical decisions are not arithmetic. A calculator…
-
[2026 update] Regional warehouse stock versus direct despatch Replied, post #118 · Sourcing › Logistics · 30 Jun 2026 · 9 likes Right, and stated more narrowly than I would have dared to state it.
-
Semaglutide and gastric emptying — the mechanism behind most of the side-effect profile Replied, post #83 · Compounds › Semaglutide · 29 Jun 2026 · 26 likes Checked the semaglutide and gastric emptying claim against the primary source this morning. It survives, with a narrower scope than the version quoted here. Posting the…
-
Publication patterns in the BPC-157 literature, examined Replied, post #18 · Compounds › Repair & healing peptides · 21 Jun 2026 · 10 likes Confirming post #17 from a second method, which matters more than confirming it from a second person. Nothing in this subcategory is medical advice and several members…
-
Reference intervals: how they are constructed and why one in twenty flags — does this… Replied, post #3 · Clinical › Bloodwork · 7 Jun 2026 · 24 likes Where the Reference intervals reasoning breaks down for me is the step from the group result to the individual case. That step is almost never argued for.
-
A widely repeated interaction claim that turns out to be unsupported — what changed since Replied, post #50 · Practice › Interactions · 24 May 2026 · 13 likes Anyone asking an interaction question should list everything, including the things they consider irrelevant. The irrelevant one is the answer more often than chance…
-
GLP-1 receptor distribution: central and peripheral Replied, post #53 · Pharmacology › Receptor biology · 20 May 2026 · 2 likes On post #49 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification. Receptor occupancy required for a clinical effect is not the same as full occupancy, and dose-response…
-
Why the titration planner refuses to produce a schedule below a floor Replied, post #72 · Data & Tools › Calculators · 11 May 2026 · 16 likes Post #69 is the version of this I will quote in future. One addition. Where I would push back on the titration planner refuses consensus is the confidence, not the…
-
Official shortage notices and what they authorise Replied, post #37 · Access › Shortages · 7 May 2026 · 9 likes Post #35 describes the usual case. This is about the unusual one. I have been on both sides of the official shortage notices argument in this category within eighteen…
-
Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma — what changed since Replied, post #29 · Safety › Contraindications · 5 May 2026 · 33 likes Confirming post #26 from a second method, which matters more than confirming it from a second person. Disordered eating history: appetite suppression can trigger…