t.lindqvist

TL2 · Galway

Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Galway.

Joined 20 January 2025 · last posted 4d

85Posts here

0Topics

0Solutions

563Likes received

528Likes given

17Badges

181Days visited

2.7kPosts read

Recent activity

Full stream

Reading order for a first week here, and what to skip until later — what changed since Replied, post #79 · Start Here › Welcome · 24 Jul 2026 · 24 likes This is the sort of exchange that makes the archive worth searching.
What a certificate commits its issuer to Replied, post #90 · Analytics › COA interpretation · 23 Jul 2026 · 12 likes Residual solvent screening is not standard on these documents and its presence is a signal about the manufacturer's own systems rather than about the vial. Filing this…
Revisiting: Why the absence of controlled human data on BPC-157 matters more than people… Replied, post #49 · Compounds › Repair & healing peptides · 23 Jul 2026 · 0 likes I read post #48 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite. Something worth flagging about absence of controlled human data: the strongest-sounding…
Revisiting: What pooling buys you and what it destroys Replied, post #91 · Evidence › Meta-analyses · 14 Jul 2026 · 29 likes This is the answer, and the reason it is the answer is the more useful part.
Documenting a supplier's response to a discrepancy Replied, post #32 · Sourcing › Vendor reports · 7 Jul 2026 · 33 likes Photograph the vial and the label before opening. It costs ten seconds and it is what turns a report into something checkable. The conclusion is tentative; the…
Revisiting: Journal club: SURMOUNT-OSA and a hard endpoint in a soft field Replied, post #86 · Evidence › Journal club · 6 Jul 2026 · 1 like SURMOUNT-OSA looks different depending on whether you are reading the primary literature or the summaries of it, and the difference is not in our favour.
Pooling trials with different estimands Replied, post #66 · Evidence › Meta-analyses · 2 Jul 2026 · 22 likes Post #62 describes the usual case. This is about the unusual one. Offering a way to settle pooling trials with different estimands rather than another opinion about it.…
Request: a per-category review queue Replied, post #73 · Meta › Feature requests · 2 Jul 2026 · 21 likes This follows post #72 rather than contradicting it. Request with the use case rather than the feature. I frequently want every topic that cites a particular maintained…
[2026 update] Area percent versus weight percent: the confusion that causes most arguments Replied, post #65 · Analytics › HPLC & UHPLC · 30 Jun 2026 · 0 likes That is a fair summary of where the discussion has got to.
Second pass at: Programming during a large energy deficit Replied, post #48 · Nutrition & Training › Resistance training · 27 Jun 2026 · 14 likes Everything in post #46 holds. The case it does not cover is the one I have. If someone has run Programming during a large energy properly I would rather read that than…
An appeal that succeeded, with the letter structure — the long version Replied, post #116 · Access › Insurance & coverage · 18 Jun 2026 · 0 likes Picking up post #115: that is the part I would want checked first. Appeal deadlines are strict and are stated in the letter. Missing one is the most avoidable way to…
Why fasting instructions for oral semaglutide are not optional advice Replied, post #46 · Compounds › Oral incretins · 17 Jun 2026 · 5 likes PIONEER 6 is the cardiovascular outcome trial for oral semaglutide and it enrolled a diabetes population at high cardiovascular risk. Quoting it outside that population…