Assessing a warm arrival: I would want to see the raw numbers rather than the summary before agreeing. Summaries lose exactly the information that would settle this.
0 likes 2.2y
Sourcing · Logistics · continued
Assessing a warm arrival: the decision process — one year on posts 91–120
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
a.batista, post #25: I had read the opposite somewhere and cannot now find where, which tells me something. Go to post
Adding the measurement that post #90 says would settle it.
Anyone deciding whether a delay is a problem should ask what would change if they waited another week. Usually the answer is nothing.
I would want a second opinion before relying on that.
b.wikstrom, post #46: Documentation after arrival: photograph the parcel and its contents on arrival. If something later turns out wrong (damage, loss, wrong item) you have evidence of the condition it arrived in. Go to post
Post #92 describes the usual case. This is about the unusual one.
I would be cautious about generalising from the Assessing a warm arrival example above. It is a good example. It is one example.
Marking my place. If it changes for me I will come back and say so.
9 likes 2.2y
n.cardoso, post #58: Posting my Assessing a warm arrival numbers with the method attached so they can be discounted properly. Uncontrolled, unblinded, and collected by someone who wanted a particular answer. Go to post
The same route behaves differently in different months. A single good or bad experience is one sample from a distribution.
Post #98 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
What I would check first on Assessing a warm arrival is whether the thing being measured moved or whether the way of measuring it moved. Those look identical in a graph.
2 likes 2.2y
a.nwosu, post #26: Photographing the parcel on arrival before opening it takes ten seconds and is the difference between a report and a recollection. Go to post
Second this, and I would have said it less carefully.
b.fonseca, post #17: Post #14 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different. The number people quote for Assessing a warm arrival is a central estimate presented without its interval, and the interval is wide enough that the estimate is nearly uninformative on its own. Go to post
Confirming post #99 from a second method, which matters more than confirming it from a second person.
Answering the Assessing a warm arrival question as asked, then the question I think is meant. As asked: yes, with the qualification below. As meant: it depends on how the first measurement was taken.
y.mensah, post #40: Clear enough that I do not think I have a follow-up, which is unusual. Go to post
I had written a reply contradicting post #98 and deleted it. Here is what survived.
Packaging integrity on arrival: if a parcel arrives with compromised packaging, that is evidence of a handling problem in transit. The contents may or may not be compromised but you have reason to be cautious.
The strength of my opinion here exceeds the strength of my evidence.
Import restrictions by jurisdiction: what is legal to import for personal use varies enormously by country. Some jurisdictions are quite permissive; others are not. Checking your own country's rules before ordering is prudent.
9 likes 2.2y
Collapsed as off-topic by two members at trust level 3 or above
Post #104 is the version of this I will quote in future. One addition.
Documentation after arrival: photograph the parcel and its contents on arrival. If something later turns out wrong (damage, loss, wrong item) you have evidence of the condition it arrived in.
That is the version I would defend. It is not the version I started with.
r.lundgren, post #52: Post #48 and I disagree about the size of the effect, not about the direction. Delivery to an address where somebody is present is worth more for cold-chain material than any packing decision available to the supplier. Go to post
Assessing a warm arrival is well covered in the tag pages, and the older discussions are better than the recent ones because they were argued out properly. Worth twenty minutes before adding to this one.
Practical answer on Assessing a warm arrival, since the theoretical one is upthread: do the simplest check first, write down the result, and only then decide whether the complicated explanation is needed. It usually is not.
5 likes 2.2y
Anyone deciding whether a delay is a problem should ask what would change if they waited another week. Usually the answer is nothing.
0 likes 2.2y
c.amankwah, post #66: Delivery to an address where somebody is present is worth more for cold-chain material than any packing decision available to the supplier. Go to post
Import restrictions by jurisdiction: what is legal to import for personal use varies enormously by country. Some jurisdictions are quite permissive; others are not. Checking your own country's rules before ordering is prudent.
m.stephanopoulos, post #11: Practical experience of Assessing a warm arrival, offered as one case with the conditions stated, not as a general finding. Conditions first, because they are what make it interpretable. Go to post
Split shipments reduce single-point risk and increase the number of transits. Which trade is right depends on what you are protecting against.
I looked this up rather than remembered it, which is the right order.
Adding the measurement that post #113 says would settle it.
What I would tell a new member reading about Assessing a warm arrival for the first time: the confident posts are not the reliable ones, and the reliable ones are longer.
5 likes 2.2y
m.adebayo, post #117: I had written a reply contradicting post #113 and deleted it. Here is what survived. The strongest argument against my own position on Assessing a warm arrival, stated as well as I can state it, since nobody else has yet. Go to post
Peak periods and public holidays affect this more than any other factor and are entirely predictable in advance.
It is the sort of thing that seems obvious in retrospect and was not at the time.
I would keep Assessing a warm arrival and the decision it usually gets used for separate in this thread. They are related and they are not the same question, and merging them is why the last one went badly.
19 likes 2.2y