The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Evidence · Journal club

Journal club: semaglutide in MASH, and surrogate endpoints — does this still hold?

Solved Closed
Solved by e.mensa in post #3
SURPASS-2 (N Engl J Med 2021): Direct comparison of tirzepatide with semaglutide 1.0 mg. The 1.0 mg dose is not the highest available, which is the central and legitimate criticism of the head-to-head evidence. It is the kind of thing that is obvious once and never again.

Jump to the accepted answer →

BD
b.dumitruTL29 Dec 2025#1

Journal club: semaglutide in MASH, and surrogate endpoints — does this still hold? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below.

A narrow question about semaglutide in MASH, deliberately narrow, because the broad version has been asked here four times and produced four long threads and no answer.

One question, stated units, stated method, and what I have already ruled out.

0 likes 8mo
B
BBramleyTL3Regular2 Jan 2026#2

SELECT (N Engl J Med 2023): Semaglutide cardiovascular outcomes without diabetes. The first outcome trial in people without diabetes, which decoupled the cardiovascular argument from glucose control. Read the absolute numbers, not just the relative reduction.

28 likes 7mo
EM
e.mensaTL2 Solution20 Jan 2026#3

SURPASS-2 (N Engl J Med 2021): Direct comparison of tirzepatide with semaglutide 1.0 mg. The 1.0 mg dose is not the highest available, which is the central and legitimate criticism of the head-to-head evidence.

It is the kind of thing that is obvious once and never again.

9 likes 6mo
VD
vial_deskTL3Regular4 Feb 2026#4

Picking up the opening post: that is the part I would want checked first.

SOUL (N Engl J Med 2025): Oral semaglutide cardiovascular outcomes. Extends the cardiovascular evidence to the oral formulation. Note that oral bioavailability is lower and more variable than injectable.

I would put a moderate confidence on that and no more.

2 likes 6mo
This topic was closed 90 days after the last reply. Closing is automatic for quiet topics so that a settled answer does not collect new questions underneath it. If you have a follow-up, open a new topic and link back to this one — that keeps both readable and gives your question its own title.
Moved from Meta-analyses by dr_okonkwo. Category placement is not obvious from outside and getting it wrong is expected. This topic will get better answers here. The move is recorded in the public log citing R7.

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
About the Journal club category
Our recurring session. One named paper per topic, methods first, conclusions last. Everyone reads before posting. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every…
KHSDEMSCA+2 6 12k 16mo
Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session
On the subject in the title: Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session Working notes rather than a conclusion. Bringing a claim rather than a paper, because the claim is the thing circulating. The…
NAFPALVSFT+114 125 2.5k 23h
Journal club: STEP-HFpEF and symptom endpoints — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: Journal club: STEP-HFpEF and symptom endpoints — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting a small dataset on step-hfpef and symptom endpoints. It is mine,…
EDCRFKTVIA+11 15 4k 10mo
Journal club: SUSTAIN 6 and its retinopathy signal
On the subject in the title: Journal club: SUSTAIN 6 and its retinopathy signal Working notes rather than a conclusion. Reading SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016) for the population rather than the effect,…
LAMRZHOJI+110 122 46k 1d
Journal club: SELECT, absolute risk, and how it was reported
Journal club: SELECT, absolute risk, and how it was reported Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A question about what the numbers mean rather than what they…
MSFVJF 2 52k 1mo

Related topics — sharing the tags estimand, randomised trial, number needed to treat

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Criticising the method without criticising the authors — one year on
On the subject in the title: Criticising the method without criticising the authors — one year on Working notes rather than a conclusion. A methods question rather than a substantive one, about Criticising…
KOSKJNAKSC+16 20 61k 11mo
Journal club: indirect comparison between two programmes, defended and attacked
Journal club: indirect comparison between two programmes, defended and attacked Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Trying to work out what would count as…
BPTTARNSET+122 131 5.2k just now
[2026 update] Journal club: FLOW and the renal composite, component by component
Journal club: FLOW and the renal composite, component by component Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A question about what the numbers mean rather than what…
NBTAC 2 21k 9d
Second pass at: Retatrutide mass and identity: what a report should show
Second pass at: Retatrutide mass and identity: what a report should show — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Two things I would like separated before anyone answers on…
CBTNNAFEKK+65 71 4.6k 13mo
Adjudicated events and why the definition matters
On the subject in the title: Adjudicated events and why the definition matters Working notes rather than a conclusion. A follow-up question about adjudicated events that I did not know to ask the first time.…
HBGCAV 2 4.5k 2mo