Older adults, sarcopenia risk, and the trade-off nobody quantifies — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable.
Older adults: setting out the arithmetic in full, because I have had to do it twice and I would rather nobody else did.
Every step is shown. If the answer is wrong the error will be visible, which is the point of writing it out rather than posting the result.
Post #12 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
Genetic and ancestry-related differences in response are asked about regularly and the published evidence is thin enough that the honest answer is short.
Two sources, same conclusion, and I could not rule out that one copied the other.
That is the distinction I keep failing to hold on to. Written down now.
Confirming post #45 from a second method, which matters more than confirming it from a second person.
Post-surgical populations, particularly after procedures affecting the gastrointestinal tract, interact with a delayed-emptying mechanism in ways that need specialist input.
That is the practical version. The rigorous version is longer and says the same thing.
Post-surgical populations, particularly after procedures affecting the gastrointestinal tract, interact with a delayed-emptying mechanism in ways that need specialist input.
A weak preference rather than a position.
Older adults: I have looked for the primary source twice and failed twice. Either it does not exist or it is somewhere I do not know to look, and I would like to know which.
Read the full topic (110 posts)
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Coming back to: Renal impairment: what the labelling says about dose
Renal impairment: what the labelling says about dose — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Renal impairment — I have the observation and I do not trust my interpretation of it,…
|
+30 | 34 | 48k | 18mo |
|
Adolescents: a distinct evidence base
Adolescents: a distinct evidence base Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. What changes if the standard account of adolescents is wrong? I ask because I have been…
|
3 | 11k | 9h | |
|
Older adults, sarcopenia risk, and the trade-off nobody quantifies — the long version
Older adults, sarcopenia risk, and the trade-off nobody quantifies — the long version — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A narrow question about Older adults, deliberately…
|
+64 | 69 | 15k | 7mo |
|
Type 1 diabetes: off-label use and the evidence gap — what changed since
Type 1 diabetes: off-label use and the evidence gap — what changed since — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. What changes if the standard account of Type 1 diabetes is wrong?…
|
+68 | 77 | 31k | 20mo |
|
History of disordered eating and why it changes the conversation
History of disordered eating and why it changes the conversation Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. What changes if the standard account of history of…
|
+20 | 24 | 30k | 8mo |
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adolescents: a distinct evidence base — one year on
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Adolescents: a distinct evidence base — one year on Everything below is what sits behind that. A methods question rather than a substantive one, about Adolescents.…
|
+78 | 88 | 9.3k | 3mo |
|
Absolute versus relative contraindications
On the subject in the title: Absolute versus relative contraindications Working notes rather than a conclusion. Proposing that absolute versus relative contraindications deserves a maintained page rather than…
|
+4 | 8 | 23k | 8mo |
|
About the Contraindications category
Absolute and relative contraindications, and the conditions that change the calculus. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its…
|
+6 | 10 | 35k | 14mo |
|
Coming back to: Renal impairment: what the labelling says about dose
Renal impairment: what the labelling says about dose — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Renal impairment — I have the observation and I do not trust my interpretation of it,…
|
+30 | 34 | 48k | 18mo |
|
Pancreatitis history and the risk calculus
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Pancreatitis history and the risk calculus Everything below is what sits behind that. I would like to know what people here actually do about pancreatitis history,…
|
+28 | 32 | 52k | 17h |