The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Topic summary

Racemisation and why it is invisible to a mass measurement — what changed since

This is a generated summary. It shows the 5 most-liked posts from a topic of 16, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.
TV
t.verhoevenTL21 Apr 2026#1

Racemisation and why it is invisible to a mass measurement — what changed since Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did.

What changes if the standard account of Racemisation is wrong? I ask because I have been treating it as settled and I noticed this week that I could not say why.

Working through the consequences rather than the evidence, since others here are better placed on the evidence.

60 likes 4mo
BV
bias_varianceTL4Biostatistician13 Apr 2026#2

Relative response factors mean impurities are not detected in proportion to how much of them is present. A one per cent peak is not one per cent by mass unless the response factors happen to match.

Genuinely open to being wrong about this one.

17 likes 3mo
CR
compounding_ruthTL4Pharmacist14 May 2026#6

Incomplete deprotection leaves a protecting group attached, raising the mass substantially and usually pushing retention much later. A late-eluting peak on a peptide chromatogram is worth asking about.

23 likes 2mo
JS
j.sandvikTL23 Jun 2026#9
impurity_table, post #8: Fair, and the limits you put on it are the part I will remember. Go to post

Racemisation produces a diastereomer that is mass-identical and chromatographically resolvable only on a method chosen for the purpose. Standard reversed-phase frequently will not separate it.

18 likes in reply to #8 2mo
BR
buffer_reviewTL3Regular14 Jun 2026#11

I would put moderate confidence on the mainstream reading of Racemisation and no more. That is not scepticism for its own sake; it is where the sourcing actually stops.

28 likes 1mo

Read the full topic (16 posts)

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Coming back to: Oxidation pathways for methionine and tryptophan
Oxidation pathways for methionine and tryptophan Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Reading back through what has been written here about Oxidation pathways for…
YRFHKRZSCP+1 5 36k 15mo
Revisiting: Aggregates and why a purity assay may miss them entirely
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: Aggregates and why a purity assay may miss them entirely Everything below is what sits behind that. I would like to disagree carefully with the settled…
LVNCOLNVMS+48 53 918 8mo
Follow-up: Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient?
Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. A follow-up question about Attributing a new peak that I did…
KIABCSGV+15 19 671 17mo
Trifluoroacetate content and its consequences
Trifluoroacetate content and its consequences — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. What changes if the standard account of trifluoroacetate content is wrong? I ask because I…
AIRDRVHFAV+123 134 31k 5mo
Racemisation and why it is invisible to a mass measurement
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Racemisation and why it is invisible to a mass measurement Everything below is what sits behind that. A question about racemisation that I think has a definite…
NTKCTDOPA+120 127 41k 1mo

Related topics — sharing the tags forced degradation, water content, counter-ion content

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Second pass at: Where impurities in solid-phase peptide synthesis come from
Second pass at: Where impurities in solid-phase peptide synthesis come from Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Impurities in solid-phase peptide synthesis, from…
GHDBEVLSMP+4 8 7.2k 1mo
Second pass at: Buffers, pH and why a formulation is a formulation
Second pass at: Buffers, pH and why a formulation is a formulation Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Posting a small dataset on Buffers. It is mine, it is…
SCRPADYRC+24 28 1.5k 21mo
Mass error in ppm: the arithmetic and the caveat
Mass error in ppm: the arithmetic and the caveat Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked.…
KCCIAMCDBV+108 125 1.5k 5mo
Preservatives: function, testing, and limits
Preservatives: function, testing, and limits — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. An honest uncertainty about preservatives rather than a disguised assertion. I do not know…
JDMAVSNHST+23 27 3.7k 16mo
Adsorption to container surfaces and to plastics
On the subject in the title: Adsorption to container surfaces and to plastics Working notes rather than a conclusion. I was wrong about adsorption in a thread last spring and I would like to correct it…
CTSOCWRMML+13 17 4.3k 5mo