Storing a pen in use versus a pen unopened Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did.
Proposing that storing a pen deserves a maintained page rather than a recurring topic, and drafting the skeleton here so that the argument about scope happens before the writing rather than after.
What I think belongs on it, what does not, and the three claims that would need a citation each.
Holding the pen in place for the stated count after the plunger stops is the manufacturer's answer to leakage at the site. It is on the instruction leaflet and it is the step most often skipped.
That is what I would do. It may not be what is correct.
The opening post put the caveat in the right place and I want to underline it.
Comparing cost per milligram between a pen and a vial ignores wastage, dead volume and the number of doses actually obtainable. Cost per delivered dose at your dose is the comparison that survives.
A pen that has been dropped may not be visibly damaged and may not deliver accurately afterwards. Manufacturers say to replace rather than to test, and there is no test a user can do.
Storage after first use: most pens can be stored at room temperature after first use, even if unrefrigerated, for a limited time (often 28 days). Check your specific pen's labelling.
Post #5 and I disagree about the size of the effect, not about the direction.
Pen confusion between compounds: if you are using multiple pens or alternating pens, confirming you have the correct pen before injection prevents administration errors. Check the label every time.
I looked this up rather than remembered it, which is the right order.
Adding a note of thanks rather than an opinion. I did not know most of that.
I read post #5 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
A pen that will not dial to the intended dose is usually telling you the cartridge does not contain enough for it. That is a designed behaviour rather than a fault.
Post #9 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
Nothing here is medical advice, and pen technique is the single easiest thing to have demonstrated in person rather than learned from a description.
Dose counters: pens show the remaining number of doses. When the counter reaches zero, the pen is empty and cannot deliver more. Noting the counter before injection prevents running out unexpectedly.
Worth reading the earlier posts in this thread before acting on mine.
Sensible. I would want the same detail before I acted on it either.
Off-label dosing with a pen: if you want to deliver a dose different from the pen's pre-set steps (e.g., halfway between two step doses), that is off-label use. Some pens allow it; others do not. Confirm before attempting.
A pen delivers a fixed or dialled dose from a cartridge and is a metering device rather than simply a covered syringe. That is why dose changes are constrained to whatever the mechanism supports.
That is the version I use. It may not be the version that is correct.
Post #14 and I disagree about the size of the effect, not about the direction.
Storage instructions for a pen typically differ before and after first use, and the in-use period is the one people miss. It is on the carton.
I am not the right person to answer the follow-up to this.
Disposal of a used pen is a sharps question even where the needle is retracted, and local rules vary more than people expect.
That holds for the case as described. Change the assumptions and it may not.
Adding the measurement that post #18 says would settle it.
Travel with a pen raises a cold-chain question and a documentation question. The second is the one people forget until an airport.
The reasoning is more useful than the number, which is why I have shown it.
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Needle changes between doses on a reusable pen
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Needle changes between doses on a reusable pen Everything below is what sits behind that. The question about needle changes between doses that I actually want…
|
+34 | 38 | 1.5k | 10mo |
|
Drawing from a pen cartridge with a syringe: how the risk profile changes
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Drawing from a pen cartridge with a syringe: how the risk profile changes Everything below is what sits behind that. Question about a metering device rather than…
|
2 | 159 | 19mo | |
|
Coming back to: Pen dose counters: what a click does and does not guarantee
Pen dose counters: what a click does and does not guarantee — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Reading back through what has been written here about Pen dose counters, three…
|
4 | 105 | 5mo | |
|
Priming a pen and whether the primed volume is wasted — one year on
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Priming a pen and whether the primed volume is wasted — one year on Everything below is what sits behind that. I would like to disagree carefully with the settled…
|
+3 | 7 | 5.4k | 22mo |
|
Storing a pen in use versus a pen unopened — what changed since
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Storing a pen in use versus a pen unopened — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. What changes if the standard account of Storing a pen is…
|
2 | 206 | 15mo |
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
A partial dose because the pen emptied mid-injection
A partial dose because the pen emptied mid-injection Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A methods question rather than a substantive one, about partial dose…
|
+108 | 120 | 1.5k | 7mo |
|
Titrating on tolerability rather than on the calendar
On the subject in the title: Titrating on tolerability rather than on the calendar Working notes rather than a conclusion. An honest uncertainty about titrating on tolerability rather than a disguised…
|
2 | 31k | 13mo | |
|
Second pass at: Adsorptive losses at low concentration, and why dilute solutions are fragile
On the subject in the title: Second pass at: Adsorptive losses at low concentration, and why dilute solutions are fragile Working notes rather than a conclusion. The question about Adsorptive losses that I…
|
+77 | 87 | 58k | 4mo |
|
Coming back to: Adsorption to container surfaces and to plastics
Adsorption to container surfaces and to plastics — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Adsorption — I have the observation and I do not trust my interpretation of it, so I am…
|
2 | 459 | 17mo | |
|
Second pass at: A reconstituted vial's beyond-use date and the reasoning behind common figures
Second pass at: A reconstituted vial's beyond-use date and the reasoning behind common figures Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Something changed and I would…
|
+4 | 8 | 20k | 8mo |