a.kowalczyk
TL2 Regular · Kraków, PL
Reads carefully, cites properly, posts rarely.
Joined 22 October 2024 · last posted 4d
80Posts here
1Topics
1Solutions
1.5kLikes received
794Likes given
20Badges
238Days visited
4.5kPosts read
Stated areas
Recent activity
Full stream-
Prior authorisation: what the criteria usually require — a second dataset Replied, post #64 · Access › Insurance & coverage · 24 Jul 2026 · 0 likes A clinician's supporting letter that addresses the criteria explicitly is worth considerably more than one that describes the patient generally.
-
Revisiting: Hepatic effects of glucagon receptor agonism: the mechanistic worry Replied, post #11 · Compounds › Retatrutide · 23 Jul 2026 · 26 likes Taking post #10 at face value and following it one step further. Triple agonism at GLP-1, GIP and glucagon receptors is the defining feature and the glucagon limb is…
-
What consumer-accessible tests can and cannot determine — a second dataset Replied, post #104 · Analytics › Home & field testing · 20 Jul 2026 · 12 likes Worth separating two things that post #102 runs together. Precision of home tests: most consumer-accessible devices are not precise to the level people want ("is this…
-
[2026 update] Interpreting a result that disagrees with the supplier's certificate Replied, post #103 · Sourcing › Independent verification · 18 Jul 2026 · 11 likes Coming back to post #99, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer. Asking the supplier before publishing a discrepancy is the convention here. Most…
-
Journal club: SUSTAIN 6 and its retinopathy signal Replied, post #71 · Evidence › Journal club · 16 Jul 2026 · 11 likes The most common failure mode is spending fifty minutes on the effect size and ten on the population. Reversing that ratio would improve most sessions. On reflection I…
-
Journal club: indirect comparison between two programmes, defended and attacked Replied, post #119 · Evidence › Journal club · 16 Jul 2026 · 2 likes Where the group cannot agree, record the disagreement rather than resolving it by seniority. The recorded disagreement is more honest and more useful later.
-
Why we ask for units every single time, with three examples of what goes wrong Replied, post #121 · Start Here › How to Ask · 12 Jul 2026 · 20 likes It is fine to say you cannot explain why you are asking. Nobody will press, and the technical part of the question can usually be answered without the context. A…
-
Coming back to: Specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, range, robustness — with… Replied, post #86 · Analytics › Method validation · 11 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Specificity is the first question: does the method separate the analyte from everything reasonably expected to be present? A method that has not been challenged with…
-
Common supplements people ask about, assessed one at a time Replied, post #24 · Practice › Interactions · 9 Jul 2026 · 17 likes Confirming post #23 from a second method, which matters more than confirming it from a second person. Common supplements: I would want to see the raw numbers rather…
-
What I would want from a home test that does not exist yet — what changed since Replied, post #76 · Analytics › Home & field testing · 1 Jul 2026 · 7 likes This follows post #74 rather than contradicting it. Lateral-flow devices: like a rapid COVID test. They have a reagent strip and produce a colour result. They are quick…
-
Aggregate verification data across the directory, with caveats Replied, post #22 · Sourcing › Independent verification · 1 Jul 2026 · 4 likes Verification records are dated because they expire in usefulness. A result from two years ago describes a lot from two years ago. Take the reasoning and check the…
-
Reading a rodent study on a secretagogue without over-extrapolating — the long version Replied, post #6 · Compounds › Secretagogues & GH axis · 23 Jun 2026 · 0 likes Adding a data point of agreement rather than a data point.