va.baptista
TL2 · Brno
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Brno.
Joined 5 May 2025 · last posted 6d
70Posts here
2Topics
0Solutions
179Likes received
172Likes given
19Badges
87Days visited
1kPosts read
Recent activity
Full stream-
What is genuinely unknown about long-term amylin agonism Replied, post #68 · Compounds › Cagrilintide & amylin analogues · 22 Jul 2026 · 28 likes I read post #64 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite. On storage: aggregation-prone peptides are the ones where repeated warming and cooling does…
-
Reading a home test result without over-claiming Replied, post #127 · Analytics › Home & field testing · 20 Jul 2026 · 13 likes Narrowing post #124, because the general version has more than one answer. The honest cost comparison is a home kit against a single independent submission. For most…
-
Muscle cramps: the ordinary causes before the exotic ones — a second dataset Replied, post #51 · Practice › Side effects · 15 Jul 2026 · 19 likes Reading back through the Muscle cramps threads from last year, the same three questions come up every time and only one of them has ever been answered properly. That…
-
Revisiting: Why the absence of controlled human data on BPC-157 matters more than people… Replied, post #25 · Compounds › Repair & healing peptides · 11 Jul 2026 · 0 likes If you are new and reading this thread for the answer to absence of controlled human data: the answer is conditional, the conditions are in the third reply, and the…
-
Pooling trials with different estimands Replied, post #82 · Evidence › Meta-analyses · 9 Jul 2026 · 10 likes On pooling trials with different estimands the community has more anecdote than the confidence in this thread implies, and I include my own contribution in that.
-
A structured critique template this community uses — a second dataset Replied, post #32 · Evidence › Study critique · 8 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Where a critique rests on a subgroup, check whether the interaction was tested. A difference between subgroups that is not statistically supported is not a difference.…
-
Alcohol: what is documented and what is folklore Replied, post #98 · Practice › Interactions · 7 Jul 2026 · 16 likes Anything that also slows gut motility compounds the same mechanism. That is a plausibility argument rather than a documented interaction, and it should be labelled as…
-
Insurance and replacement policies, compared Replied, post #57 · Sourcing › Logistics · 2 Jul 2026 · 3 likes Answering the question post #55 raises rather than the one it answers. Import restrictions by jurisdiction: what is legal to import for personal use varies enormously…
-
[2026 update] Currency conversion and the cost you did not see Replied, post #23 · Sourcing › Payments · 23 Jun 2026 · 0 likes Taking post #22 at face value and following it one step further. Escrow services: some third-party services hold payment until the buyer confirms receipt. They add cost…
-
Journal club: indirect comparison between two programmes, defended and attacked Replied, post #86 · Evidence › Journal club · 14 Jun 2026 · 32 likes Narrowing post #84, because the general version has more than one answer. The figures usually contain the finding and the text usually contains the interpretation.…
-
Coming back to: A structured critique template this community uses Replied, post #32 · Evidence › Study critique · 13 Jun 2026 · 12 likes Where a critique rests on a subgroup, check whether the interaction was tested. A difference between subgroups that is not statistically supported is not a difference.…
-
Revisiting: What pooling buys you and what it destroys Replied, post #35 · Evidence › Meta-analyses · 27 May 2026 · 0 likes Since pooling buys keeps coming up, it should probably be a maintained page rather than a recurring thread. I am happy to draft it if someone with more direct…