The fields that make one usable: lot identifier matching the container, test date, method identification specific enough to reproduce, the result as a number, and the acceptance criterion stated separately from the result.
31 likes 10mo
Topic summary
Batch date after test date, and other internal inconsistencies
This is a generated summary. It shows the 5 most-liked posts from a topic of 32, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.
Coming back to the opening post, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
The distinction between release testing and characterisation is one industrial documents make and retail ones usually do not. It is the difference between "we tested every lot for this" and "we established this once".
16 likes 10mo
t.brandt, post #3: Coming back to the opening post, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer. The distinction between release testing and characterisation is one industrial documents make and retail ones usually do not. It is the difference between "we tested every lot for this" and "we established this once". Go to post
Coming back to post #3, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Reporting rather than recommending, on batch date. What happened is above. Whether it should have is a different question and not one I am qualified to answer.
Everything in post #14 holds. The case it does not cover is the one I have.
Batch date is a good example of a question where the honest answer is boring and the interesting answers are unsupported. I would go with boring.
18 likes 8mo
Thank you for the correction. I would rather find out here than later.
19 likes 8mo
Read the full topic (32 posts)
This topic was referenced in
- About the COA interpretation categoryAnalytics › COA interpretation · 12 replies
- Reused chromatograms across lots: how to spot itAnalytics › COA interpretation · 60 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Counter-ion form: the field almost nobody reports
Counter-ion form: the field almost nobody reports Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Counter-ion form, from the point of view of someone who has read the…
|
3 | 11k | 2mo | |
|
Specification in the result column: why that is a meaningful error
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Specification in the result column: why that is a meaningful error Everything below is what sits behind that. A documentation question rather than an analytical…
|
+107 | 129 | 41k | 5mo |
|
Revisiting: A field-by-field walk through a certificate of analysis
Revisiting: A field-by-field walk through a certificate of analysis Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I would like to disagree carefully with the settled view…
|
+37 | 41 | 656 | 3mo |
|
Counter-ion form: the field almost nobody reports — one year on
On the subject in the title: Counter-ion form: the field almost nobody reports — one year on Working notes rather than a conclusion. The question about Counter-ion form that I actually want answered is the…
|
+121 | 139 | 31k | 16mo |
|
Certificates issued by the seller versus by a laboratory
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Certificates issued by the seller versus by a laboratory Everything below is what sits behind that. I would like to understand what this number means before I…
|
+58 | 65 | 1.2k | 15mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags certificate of analysis, reference standards, batch & lot numbers
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Second pass at: Certificates issued by the seller versus by a laboratory
Second pass at: Certificates issued by the seller versus by a laboratory — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Two reports on the same lot, and I would like help deciding…
|
+81 | 92 | 20k | 18mo |
|
What a simple presence test is genuinely useful for
What a simple presence test is genuinely useful for — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Trying to work out what would count as evidence on simple presence…
|
2 | 58 | 1d | |
|
A supplier who responds to a discrepancy with silence
On the subject in the title: A supplier who responds to a discrepancy with silence Working notes rather than a conclusion. Two things I would like separated before anyone answers on supplier, because they get…
|
2 | 6.1k | 16mo | |
|
Second pass at: Why chargeback is not the safety net people assume
Second pass at: Why chargeback is not the safety net people assume Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Asking about the record rather than the transfer. Every…
|
2 | 25k | 3mo | |
|
What "verified" means on our vendor pages, stated narrowly
What "verified" means on our vendor pages, stated narrowly — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. A question about how a record should be read rather than…
|
+27 | 31 | 27k | 7mo |