The most useful pricing posts here are the ones that show the arithmetic rather than the conclusion.
That matches what I was told, which is not the same as knowing it.
The most useful pricing posts here are the ones that show the arithmetic rather than the conclusion.
That matches what I was told, which is not the same as knowing it.
The most useful pricing posts here are the ones that show the arithmetic rather than the conclusion.
The answer changed when I changed how I was measuring, which was informative.
Post #38 put the caveat in the right place and I want to underline it.
The most useful pricing posts here are the ones that show the arithmetic rather than the conclusion.
Nothing here is financial advice and none of it is a route to a transaction.
It reads as pedantry until the day it does not.
On post #88 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.
Insurance tier placement: a compound might be covered but on a higher tier (higher copay). Moving to a lower tier usually requires prior authorization or documented failure of cheaper alternatives.
Picking up post #105: that is the part I would want checked first.
Insurance tier placement: a compound might be covered but on a higher tier (higher copay). Moving to a lower tier usually requires prior authorization or documented failure of cheaper alternatives.
The most useful pricing posts here are the ones that show the arithmetic rather than the conclusion.
Two sources, same conclusion, and I could not rule out that one copied the other.
Insurance tier placement: a compound might be covered but on a higher tier (higher copay). Moving to a lower tier usually requires prior authorization or documented failure of cheaper alternatives.
Filing this under things that are true until someone shows me otherwise.
Read the full topic (125 posts)
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Revisiting: List price versus negotiated price versus what you pay
Revisiting: List price versus negotiated price versus what you pay — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Working notes on List price versus negotiated price rather than a…
|
+24 | 28 | 50k | 12mo |
|
List price versus negotiated price versus what you pay
On the subject in the title: List price versus negotiated price versus what you pay Working notes rather than a conclusion. List price versus negotiated price — I have the observation and I do not trust my…
|
+99 | 115 | 11k | 3mo |
|
Manufacturer assistance programmes and their eligibility rules
On the subject in the title: Manufacturer assistance programmes and their eligibility rules Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have spent a fortnight trying to pin manufacturer assistance programmes…
|
+37 | 42 | 32k | 11d |
|
Comparing prices across jurisdictions without misleading yourself
Comparing prices across jurisdictions without misleading yourself — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Working notes on comparing prices across jurisdictions rather than a…
|
+78 | 83 | 33k | 1mo |
|
Cost per milligram, computed honestly across formats
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Cost per milligram, computed honestly across formats Everything below is what sits behind that. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in this…
|
2 | 47k | 18mo |
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Deamidation and the close-eluting pair it produces — the long version
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Deamidation and the close-eluting pair it produces — the long version Everything below is what sits behind that. A narrow question about Deamidation, deliberately…
|
3 | 347 | 24d | |
|
Comparing two chromatograms from different laboratories, properly
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Comparing two chromatograms from different laboratories, properly Everything below is what sits behind that. I would like to understand what this number means…
|
+35 | 40 | 22k | 7mo |
|
A 40-week log with the measurement method stated — does this still hold?
A 40-week log with the measurement method stated — does this still hold? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Posting a small dataset on 40-week log. It is…
|
+1 | 5 | 14k | 2mo |
|
Bioimpedance and hydration: why the number moves
Bioimpedance and hydration: why the number moves — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have spent a fortnight trying to pin bioimpedance and hydration down and I want to set…
|
+62 | 70 | 13k | 23d |
|
External review after an internal denial
External review after an internal denial Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Proposing that external review deserves a maintained page rather than a recurring…
|
2 | 18k | 1mo |