Follow-up: History of disordered eating and why it changes the conversation

Post-surgical populations, particularly after procedures affecting the gastrointestinal tract, interact with a delayed-emptying mechanism in ways that need specialist input.

I would be glad to be shown a cleaner way of putting this.

Post #13 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.

Disordered eating history: a history of anorexia nervosa, bulimia, or other eating disorders changes the risk-benefit calculation because appetite suppression might trigger relapse. This population requires specialist input.

This follows post #13 rather than contradicting it.

History of disordered eating was covered in the wiki last year and the page has a review date on it, which is a better starting point than my memory of a thread.

Post #26 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.

Posting my History of disordered eating numbers with the method attached so they can be discounted properly. Uncontrolled, unblinded, and collected by someone who wanted a particular answer.

Filing a mild objection to the consensus on History of disordered eating. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit.

The failure mode on History of disordered eating is boring rather than dramatic. It is almost always the step everyone assumes was done correctly because it is too simple to get wrong.

Reading back through, this was answered upthread and I missed it. My fault.

Adding thanks rather than a view. I do not have a view worth the space.

I read the earlier replies on History of disordered eating twice before writing this, because I had assumed the opposite and wanted to be sure I was disagreeing with what was said rather than what I expected.