Mass error in ppm: the arithmetic and the caveat posts 121–126
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1 · go to the accepted answer.
Offering a way to settle mass error in ppm rather than another opinion about it. Two measurements, taken the same way, a fortnight apart. If the difference is within the noise, the question was not answerable at this precision.
Post #120 put the caveat in the right place and I want to underline it.
Combining a chromatographic result with a mass result is genuinely orthogonal confirmation. Either alone leaves a specific class of problem invisible, and the two classes do not overlap much.
Quantitation by MS: most quantitation is done by LC-UV detection at 214 nm, not by MS, because extinction coefficients are better known. MS can quantify if an internal standard is used but that requires preparation.
I have separated what I observed from what I concluded, which does not always happen.
This topic was referenced in
- MS/MS sequence confirmation: what it costs and when it is worth it — what changed sinceAnalytics › Mass spectrometry · 39 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Second pass at: Counter-ion content and its effect on measured mass
Second pass at: Counter-ion content and its effect on measured mass Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Something about Counter-ion content does not reconcile…
|
4 | 16k | 4mo | |
|
Second pass at: What a 2 ppm match establishes, and what it does not
Second pass at: What a 2 ppm match establishes, and what it does not — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Two things I would like separated before anyone answers on 2 ppm…
|
+44 | 49 | 8.1k | 1d |
|
[2026 update] Charge states for a 4 kDa peptide, worked through
On the subject in the title: Charge states for a 4 kDa peptide, worked through Working notes rather than a conclusion. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked. semaglutide has a…
|
+116 | 135 | 31k | 3mo |
|
MS/MS sequence confirmation: what it costs and when it is worth it
MS/MS sequence confirmation: what it costs and when it is worth it — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
|
+2 | 6 | 2.7k | 1d |
|
Reading an MS report that only gives you a single number — the long version
Reading an MS report that only gives you a single number — the long version — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to understand what this number means before I…
|
2 | 47k | 18mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags LC-MS, high-resolution MS, MALDI-TOF
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Buffers, pH and why a formulation is a formulation
Buffers, pH and why a formulation is a formulation Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A formulation question rather than a pharmacological one, though the two…
|
+11 | 15 | 51k | 21mo |
|
[2026 update] Charge states for a 4 kDa peptide, worked through
On the subject in the title: Charge states for a 4 kDa peptide, worked through Working notes rather than a conclusion. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked. semaglutide has a…
|
+116 | 135 | 31k | 3mo |
|
Coming back to: Oxidation and deamidation mass shifts, tabulated
Oxidation and deamidation mass shifts, tabulated — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Reading back through what has been written here about Oxidation and deamidation mass…
|
+34 | 38 | 4.8k | 10mo |
|
Oxidation and deamidation mass shifts, tabulated
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Oxidation and deamidation mass shifts, tabulated Everything below is what sits behind that. Oxidation and deamidation mass shifts, and specifically the version of…
|
+67 | 76 | 21k | 16mo |
|
Distinguishing a deletion sequence by mass alone
Distinguishing a deletion sequence by mass alone Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Trying to establish the boundary conditions on distinguishing a deletion…
|
+121 | 129 | 25k | 17mo |