This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
If you have to inject at a different time of day than usual, that is a much smaller perturbation than it feels for a weekly compound with a week-long half-life.
I would want to see it done twice before believing it once.
Post #61 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
Bleeding at the site is common and unremarkable at these needle gauges. Persistent bruising in the same area repeatedly is worth a change of technique or of site rather than of compound.
Reading it back, the second half matters more than the first.
On post #61 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.
Leaving the needle in for a couple of seconds after depressing the plunger reduces leakage at the site. It costs nothing and it is the fix for the "some came back out" question.
This is the sort of thing the wiki should carry and currently does not.
Needle length matters less than angle for subcutaneous delivery in most people. A short needle at ninety degrees and a longer one at forty-five put the material in roughly the same place.
Post #65 describes the usual case. This is about the unusual one.
If you have to inject at a different time of day than usual, that is a much smaller perturbation than it feels for a weekly compound with a week-long half-life.
I would hold that lightly until someone with a larger sample weighs in.
Adding the measurement that post #65 says would settle it.
Air in the syringe is a much smaller problem subcutaneously than the anxiety about it suggests, and it is still worth expelling because the bubble occupies volume you meant to be liquid.
That is the practical version. The rigorous version is longer and says the same thing.
Letting a refrigerated preparation come to room temperature before injecting reduces the sting for most people. It is not a stability requirement, it is a comfort one, and the two get confused.
Adding this to the thread rather than to the wiki, because I am not confident enough for the wiki.
The single most common technique error described here is drawing to the wrong graduation because the barrel was read at an angle. Read it straight on, at eye level, every time.
Post #68 is the version of this I will quote in future. One addition.
Injecting into an area that has become firm: lipohypertrophy — thickened fatty tissue from repeated injection in one area — changes local tissue absorption. Avoid injecting into areas that are noticeably firm or lumpy and allow those areas to recover for at least a few months.
That is one dataset and I would not build a rule on it.
Nothing in this subcategory is medical advice and none of it is a substitute for a demonstration from somebody qualified to give one, which most prescribers will do without being asked twice.
Worth reading the earlier posts in this thread before acting on mine.
If you have to inject at a different time of day than usual, that is a much smaller perturbation than it feels for a weekly compound with a week-long half-life.
The confident version of this sentence would be wrong, so here is the hedged one.
Injection discomfort: comes from needle gauge (finer = less discomfort), volume (smaller = less discomfort), temperature (room temperature or warmed is less uncomfortable than cold), and technique (smooth, purposeful injection is less uncomfortable than hesitant). All four are under your control.
That is the version I use. It may not be the version that is correct.
If you have to inject at a different time of day than usual, that is a much smaller perturbation than it feels for a weekly compound with a week-long half-life.
I am not the right person to answer the follow-up to this.
A new needle for each injection is not fussiness. A needle blunts on first use and a blunted needle is the reason the second injection hurts more than the first.
Answering the question post #75 raises rather than the one it answers.
Pinch or no pinch: the decision depends on needle length and on your own anatomy. A longer needle (8 mm and up) reaches subcutaneous tissue easily without a pinch. A shorter needle (4-6 mm) is safer with a gentle pinch. The pinch size matters less than people think; the injection angle matters more.
If you have to inject at a different time of day than usual, that is a much smaller perturbation than it feels for a weekly compound with a week-long half-life.
Pinch or no pinch: the decision depends on needle length and on your own anatomy. A longer needle (8 mm and up) reaches subcutaneous tissue easily without a pinch. A shorter needle (4-6 mm) is safer with a gentle pinch. The pinch size matters less than people think; the injection angle matters more.
Bleeding at the injection site: normal and usually minimal. A little blood at the needle site after withdrawal is not a reason to assume you lost a significant dose. The needle passed through tissue and there is a small amount of bleeding in the tract.
If you have to inject at a different time of day than usual, that is a much smaller perturbation than it feels for a weekly compound with a week-long half-life.
Noting that the question and the thing people usually mean by it are different.
Where I part company with post #79, and it is a narrow parting.
Angle of injection: 90 degrees into pinched tissue ensures subcutaneous placement. It is not always necessary and shallower angles can work, but 90 degrees into a small pinch is the safest technique to learn first.
It took me longer than it should have to see that.
Leaving the needle in for a couple of seconds after depressing the plunger reduces leakage at the site. It costs nothing and it is the fix for the "some came back out" question.
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Angle of injection and whether 90 degrees is always right — the long version
Angle of injection and whether 90 degrees is always right — the long version Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A narrow question about Angle of injection,…
|
+50 | 55 | 15k | 2d |
|
A partial dose because the pen emptied mid-injection
A partial dose because the pen emptied mid-injection Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A methods question rather than a substantive one, about partial dose…
|
+108 | 120 | 1.5k | 7mo |
|
Bleeding at the injection site: normal, and what to do about it
Bleeding at the injection site: normal, and what to do about it — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Something changed and I would like to know whether it should have. Same…
|
3 | 59k | 8mo | |
|
Drawing up with one needle and injecting with another
On the subject in the title: Drawing up with one needle and injecting with another Working notes rather than a conclusion. A question about technique rather than about dose. I have been doing the same thing…
|
+1 | 5 | 6.9k | 1d |
|
About the Administration category
Technique, needle selection, site rotation, injection discomfort, and what to do about a missed or partial dose. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit…
|
+5 | 9 | 3.1k | 12mo |
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Follow-up: A partial dose because the pen emptied mid-injection
Posting this under the heading it deserves: A partial dose because the pen emptied mid-injection Everything below is what sits behind that. A follow-up question about partial dose because the pen that I did…
|
+10 | 14 | 10k | 23mo |
|
Air bubbles in a subcutaneous injection: the honest risk assessment — does this still hold?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Air bubbles in a subcutaneous injection: the honest risk assessment — does this still hold? An honest uncertainty about Air bubbles rather than a…
|
+21 | 30 | 20k | 4mo |
|
Where the four-week escalation interval comes from, and what it is not
On the subject in the title: Where the four-week escalation interval comes from, and what it is not Working notes rather than a conclusion. Working notes on four-week escalation interval rather than a…
|
+56 | 60 | 21k | 2y |
|
Needle changes between doses on a reusable pen — does this still hold?
Needle changes between doses on a reusable pen — does this still hold? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Posting a small dataset on Needle changes…
|
+1 | 5 | 38k | 13mo |
|
Priming a pen and whether the primed volume is wasted — one year on
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Priming a pen and whether the primed volume is wasted — one year on Everything below is what sits behind that. I would like to disagree carefully with the settled…
|
+3 | 7 | 5.4k | 22mo |