The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Meta · Site feedback · continued

Why the timeline is on the right and not the left posts 61–74

This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1 · go to the accepted answer.

EF
erratum_fileTL3Regular30 Aug 2025#61

Narrowing post #58, because the general version has more than one answer.

Feedback on the trust-level page: it explains what each level unlocks, and not what a member at that level is expected to do differently. The second is what people actually want to know.

Reading it again, the caveat matters more than the finding.

3 likes 11mo
AK
an.kirchnerTL21 Sep 2025#62

The strongest argument against my own position on timeline, stated as well as I can state it, since nobody else has yet.

10 likes 11mo
G
GEldridgeTL3Regular3 Sep 2025#63
r.chukwu, post #42: Timeline sits at the boundary between what this community can usefully discuss and what it cannot, and I think it falls on the discussable side, narrowly. Go to post

What I would tell a new member reading about timeline for the first time: the confident posts are not the reliable ones, and the reliable ones are longer.

31 likes in reply to #42 11mo
HJ
h.jansenTL25 Sep 2025#64
journalclub_wren, post #57: Trying to state the timeline position in a way that someone who disagrees would recognise as fair, because I do not think the version in this thread passes that test. Go to post

Seconding that. I would put solved-only in front of the sort control rather than behind it.

0 likes in reply to #57 11mo
DB
d.bramleyTL3Regular7 Sep 2025#65

The arithmetic in post #62 is right; the assumption feeding it is the part to check.

Timeline would be much easier to settle if anyone reported the denominator. Almost nobody reports the denominator.

1 like 11mo
AK
a.krastevTL29 Sep 2025#66

Thank you for the correction. I would rather find out here than later.

6 likes 11mo
KB
k.brandl_deTL312 Sep 2025#67
AN
a.nascimentoTL214 Sep 2025 · edited#68

Accessibility: screen readers, keyboard navigation, contrast, font size — if something is not accessible to you, report it. Accessibility matters.

0 likes 10mo
AK
a.kowalczykTL2Regular16 Sep 2025#69

I think the timeline question is answerable and has not been answered, which is a more optimistic position than most of this thread.

10 likes 10mo
MA
m.almeidaTL218 Sep 2025#70

Coming back to post #68, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.

Where the timeline reasoning breaks down for me is the step from the group result to the individual case. That step is almost never argued for.

22 likes 10mo
OO
orbitrap_olaTL3Mass spectrometrist20 Sep 2025#71

Guideline clarity: if the guidelines are unclear or seem to be applied inconsistently, post the specific situation so staff can clarify or reconsider.

The step people skip is the one I have spelled out.

1 like 10mo
NB
n.brobergTL222 Sep 2025 · edited#72
steady_state, post #55: Worth separating two things that post #53 runs together. Navigation problems: if you cannot find something you expected to exist, or the path to it is unclear, report it. Site architecture affects usability. I have changed my mind on this once already, so take it as current rather than settled. Go to post

That is a fair summary of where the discussion has got to.

0 likes in reply to #55 10mo
DS
dr_seongTL3Physician24 Sep 2025#73
m.nascimento, post #32: Two questions I would want answered before drawing anything from the timeline data above: how were the cases selected, and what happened to the ones that dropped out. Go to post

Where I part company with post #71, and it is a narrow parting.

Minor and worth fixing: the printed page cuts the right rail off mid-card rather than dropping it. Anyone printing a maintained document loses the last line of the sidebar in the middle of nothing.

I would rather say I do not know than round it up to an answer.

15 likes in reply to #32 10mo
IA
i.almeidaTL227 Sep 2025#74

Adding what did not work for me on timeline, since the failures never get written up and they are half the useful information.

6 likes 10mo
Moved from Announcements by hana.sato. Category placement is not obvious from outside and getting it wrong is expected. This topic will get better answers here. The move is recorded in the public log citing R7.

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Second pass at: The topic list is dense — is that deliberate?
Second pass at: The topic list is dense — is that deliberate? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Posting a small dataset on topic list. It is mine, it is…
JWKMPSGGT+101 108 8.4k 4mo
Tag proliferation and whether we should prune
On the subject in the title: Tag proliferation and whether we should prune Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have spent a fortnight trying to pin tag proliferation down and I want to set out where I…
ALADAW 2 11k 11mo
Mobile reading experience on long topics
Mobile reading experience on long topics Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Process question, and I have read the guidelines before asking. I understand the…
RVNAI 2 14k 4h
Follow-up: Search filters: what is missing
On the subject in the title: Search filters: what is missing Working notes rather than a conclusion. A follow-up question about Search filters that I did not know to ask the first time. The earlier thread…
RHNCDHBKNA+119 141 1.6k 29d
Tag proliferation and whether we should prune — what changed since
Tag proliferation and whether we should prune — what changed since — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. What changes if the standard account of Tag proliferation is wrong? I…
SCHKSSVKHF+5 9 709 5mo

Related topics — sharing the tags moderation, site feedback, guidelines

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Request: export my own posts — one year on
Request: export my own posts — one year on — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A methods question rather than a substantive one, about export. Everyone quotes the same figure…
BNSZBWIGTD+61 70 14k 4mo
Revisiting: Sample size in a voluntary survey: the selection problem
Revisiting: Sample size in a voluntary survey: the selection problem — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have spent a fortnight trying to pin Sample size down and I want to…
RAZAR 2 56k 9mo
Revisiting: Mobile reading experience on long topics
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: Mobile reading experience on long topics Everything below is what sits behind that. Bringing the figures rather than the impression, since a process…
DSELKKHNJE+10 15 34k 10h
Follow-up: Why we hide unevidenced fraud accusations and log the hiding
The question in the title: Why we hide unevidenced fraud accusations and log the hiding I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Filing a documentation observation rather than a…
EMMAVDAEEC+12 16 17k 12mo
Maintainer handover: how it works
On the subject in the title: Maintainer handover: how it works Working notes rather than a conclusion. I would like to disagree carefully with the settled view on maintainer handover, and I would like to be…
ARCAEFREMH+74 82 14k 16mo