This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1 · go to the accepted answer.
Post #119 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
If your arithmetic gives a volume smaller than one graduation on your syringe, the answer is a lower concentration rather than a more careful hand.
Worth reading the earlier posts in this thread before acting on mine.
This is the first time the answer has come with its own limits attached. Appreciated.
Narrowing post #123, because the general version has more than one answer.
Two people can reconstitute the same vial to different concentrations and both be right. The dose is the same; only the volume drawn differs. This confuses more discussions here than any other single point.
It is a small point and it changes the answer, which is an awkward combination.
Dead volume is the part nobody mentions until it costs them a dose. A fixed-needle insulin syringe holds very little; a detachable-needle luer configuration can hold enough to matter at small doses.
One more caveat and then I will stop qualifying: the sample selected itself.
How much of the diluent volume the powder itself displaces: for a small peptide vial, the powder volume is negligible. For a larger vial or a kit with multiple compounds, the displacement can be a few tenths of a millilitre. If precision matters to you, account for it by targeting a final weight rather than a final volume.
Post #124 put the caveat in the right place and I want to underline it.
The arithmetic on 5 mg vial is the easy part and it is where the errors are, which is an uncomfortable combination. Show your working and someone will catch it.
Adding thanks rather than a view. I do not have a view worth the space.
Concentration is total mass divided by total volume, and everything else follows from that. Ten milligrams into two millilitres is five milligrams per millilitre, and it does not matter how the vial was labelled before you added anything.
A partial answer, offered because a partial answer beats none.
Swirling until fully clear before drawing is worth the extra minute. A partially dissolved preparation is not uniform and the first dose out of it is not the same as the last.
Post #131 put the caveat in the right place and I want to underline it.
Arithmetic step by step: a 5 mg vial with 2 mL of diluent gives (5 mg) / (2 mL) = 2.5 mg/mL. On a U-100 syringe at that concentration, 100 units = 1 mL = 2.5 mg, so each unit = 0.025 mg. A 0.25 mg dose = 0.25 / 0.025 = 10 units. Different concentration: different arithmetic, same principle.
The short version is the first sentence; the rest is why.
Building on post #131 rather than restating it.
Taking 5 mg vial seriously for a moment rather than deflecting: the honest position is that the community has observations and no controlled comparison, and those two things support very different sentences.
Preservative effectiveness is tested against a defined microbial challenge under defined conditions. It is not a licence to treat an entered vial as sterile indefinitely, and no supplier claims otherwise.
The best check on any reconstitution calculation is to do it twice by two different routes — mass per volume, then volume per dose — and see whether they agree. They should, and when they do not it is nearly always the concentration step.
Where I part company with post #135, and it is a narrow parting.
Over-dilution: if your target dose is 0.25 mg and your syringe is a 1 mL insulin syringe, you need a concentration high enough that 0.25 mg fits on the scale. A 0.25 mg/mL solution requires drawing the entire 1 mL syringe — not readable. A 5 mg/mL solution requires drawing 50 μL — also not practical on an insulin syringe.
I would put this at better than even and not much better.
Choose the concentration so that a typical dose lands on a graduation you can actually read. A dose that falls between two marks on a 1 mL barrel is a dose you will get wrong sooner or later.
Old habit: I write down the expected answer before I calculate it.
If your arithmetic gives a volume smaller than one graduation on your syringe, the answer is a lower concentration rather than a more careful hand.
Post #140 is the version of this I will quote in future. One addition.
Choosing a concentration on purpose rather than by accident: starting with "I want to draw 0.5 mL per dose" and working backward to the required concentration is more efficient than picking a diluent volume and hoping the math works out. State your target volume, then the required concentration follows.
I checked the source rather than the summary, and they differ.
Agreed on all of that, and I have nothing to add to it.
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
A 5 mg vial and a 0.25 mg dose: the arithmetic in full — what changed since
Posting this under the heading it deserves: A 5 mg vial and a 0.25 mg dose: the arithmetic in full — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. 5 mg vial: setting out the arithmetic in…
|
+86 | 93 | 25k | 13mo |
|
Over-dilution: when your dose falls below one readable graduation
On the subject in the title: Over-dilution: when your dose falls below one readable graduation Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have read the maintained page on this and I still have a gap, so I am…
|
+15 | 19 | 248 | 15mo |
|
Coming back to: Swirling versus inverting versus leaving it alone
Swirling versus inverting versus leaving it alone Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Swirling versus inverting versus leaving — I have the observation and I do…
|
+20 | 24 | 16k | 26d |
|
Reconstituting a multi-strength kit without mixing yourself up
Reconstituting a multi-strength kit without mixing yourself up Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have spent a fortnight trying to pin reconstituting a…
|
+108 | 123 | 30k | 11mo |
|
Why I now write the concentration on the vial in marker
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Why I now write the concentration on the vial in marker Writing this out with the numbers in it, because "roughly" is how these go wrong. Vial: 15…
|
+1 | 5 | 30k | 11d |
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to steady state after a dose increase
On the subject in the title: Time to steady state after a dose increase Working notes rather than a conclusion. Working through the kinetics rather than the pharmacology, because I think the confusion here is…
|
+151 | 163 | 9.7k | 21mo |
|
Coming back to: Where the four-week escalation interval comes from, and what it is not
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Where the four-week escalation interval comes from, and what it is not Everything below is what sits behind that. Four-week escalation interval — I have the…
|
+44 | 48 | 11k | 1d |
|
Measurement error in home scales, with a worked standard deviation
Measurement error in home scales, with a worked standard deviation Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. What changes if the standard account of measurement error…
|
+26 | 31 | 4.3k | 4mo |
|
Second pass at: Absence of evidence and evidence of absence
On the subject in the title: Second pass at: Absence of evidence and evidence of absence Working notes rather than a conclusion. Two things I would like separated before anyone answers on Absence of evidence,…
|
+50 | 55 | 18k | 16h |
|
Validating a calculator against hand arithmetic
Validating a calculator against hand arithmetic Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Validating a calculator against hand: setting out the arithmetic in full,…
|
+17 | 21 | 12k | 3mo |